v0.43.0rc1

[gmarkall]

This also includes a merge of main into the rc branch. The only substantial change is 1cd97d6, which just changes the version number, tarball location, sha256sum, and build number.

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

• This recipe is using a compiler, which now requires adding a build dependence on {{ stdlib("c") }} as well. For further details, please see META: {{ stdlib("c") }} migration conda-forge.github.io#2102.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

• This recipe is using a compiler, which now requires adding a build dependence on {{ stdlib("c") }} as well. For further details, please see META: {{ stdlib("c") }} migration conda-forge.github.io#2102.

[gmarkall]

Adding stdlib("c") did not seem to work, so although I tried it, I've reverted it for now - I'd prefer to handle it separately from building the RC version.

[jakirkham]

@conda-forge-admin , please re-render

[github-actions]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/llvmlite-feedstock/actions/runs/9105868511.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[jakirkham]

@conda-forge-admin , please re-render

[jakirkham]

Adding stdlib("c") did not seem to work, so although I tried it, I've reverted it for now - I'd prefer to handle it separately from building the RC version.

Ah ok. This is mostly cosmetic now. It pulls in these dependencies already. We are just trying to be explicit, which will help when we change the GLIBC version conda-forge builds with

As to why it failed, think all we were missing was a re-render, which I've just now tried and expect to work

That said, if we run into other issues, happy to punt on this

Edit: Looks like it passed

[jakirkham]

Do we want to try LLVM 15 given this release has support for it? Or do you want to wait on that?

[gmarkall]

Thanks for the review!

Do we want to try LLVM 15 given this release has support for it? Or do you want to wait on that?

I don't want to try it because it's only experimental. It'd be better just just get the RC out.

[jakirkham]

Sounds good. Merged

Thanks Graham! 🙏