Scip v900

[ju-manns]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

• It looks like the 'papilo' output doesn't have any tests.
• The boost-cpp output has been superseded by libboost-devel (as of 1.82), which now comes with a run-export (on libboost) as well. In case you only needed the boost headers, you should use libboost-headers.
• License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

[AntoinePrv]

Suggested change

	number: 4
	number: 0

We are starting back to zero with this version update (it should be checked at the PR, not commit level).

[ju-manns]

I see. Thanks for reviewing!

[ju-manns]

@AntoinePrv we are ready to release :) can the branch be merged or do we need to update anything because some weeks have passed?

[AntoinePrv]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[AntoinePrv]

@ju-manns, sorry, I thought you had write permission. Are you interested to join maintainers here?

[ju-manns]

@ju-manns, sorry, I thought you had write permission. Are you interested to join maintainers here?

@AntoinePrv Yeah, that would be great!