Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a 59.x LTS branch #230

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

rgommers
Copy link
Contributor

This is needed because multiple projects need to pin to setuptools < 60.0, which was the release that enabled the
vendored copy of distutils inside setuptools. That distutils copy contains backwards incompatible changes which
NumPy and SciPy don't support; other projects like Pandas and Dask use that pin too because of the LooseVersion deprecation in 60.0

See conda-forge/conda-forge-repodata-patches-feedstock#204 for more details.

[ci skip]

Also add myself as recipe maintainer.

Note: @beckermr suggested a procedure at conda-forge/conda-forge-repodata-patches-feedstock#204 (comment) that involves adding a branch to this repo (it should be named 59_x like in this PR). I don't have permissions to push that branch, so it'd be great if a reviewer could do this.

This is needed because multiple projects need to pin to
`setuptools < 60.0`, which was the release that enabled the
vendored copy of `distutils` inside `setuptools`. That
`distutils` copy contains backwards incompatible changes which
NumPy and SciPy don't support; other projects like Pandas and
Dask use that pin too because of the `LooseVersion` deprecation
in 60.0

See conda-forge/conda-forge-repodata-patches-feedstock#204
for more details.

[ci skip]
@beckermr beckermr changed the base branch from master to 59_x January 16, 2022 12:13
@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@beckermr
Copy link
Member

@conda-forge-admin rerender

@beckermr beckermr added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Jan 16, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 88e7e8c into conda-forge:59_x Jan 16, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • travis: passed
  • azure: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!

@beckermr
Copy link
Member

IDK why but azure missed the ci hook on the 59_x branch. I triggered it by hand for now.

@rgommers rgommers deleted the lts-branch-59x branch January 16, 2022 12:59
@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2022
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge the PR when CI passes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants