Add texlab 0.2.2

[bollwyvl]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml"
• License file is packaged (see here for an example)
• Source is from official source
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged)
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Build number is 0
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details)
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/texlab) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/texlab:

• License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/texlab) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[bollwyvl]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes should I be concerned about the CircleCI failure?

is @conda-forge/help-rust a thing?

[bollwyvl]

I had been working off a much-too-old master... have manually merged and force pushed

[isuruf]

See conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io#1052 about a license issue with Rust packages

[bollwyvl]

license issue with Rust packages

Ooh, that sounds brutal! I'll read more in depth over there.

[bollwyvl]

Using the techniques from conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io#1052 and pysyntect-feedstock, i've gotten it down to the following that will have to be tracked down by hand:

Licenses for the following dependencies are not being packaged:
* bytemuck (Zlib) -> https://github.com/Lokathor/bytemuck
* cesu8 (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/emk/cesu8-rs
* fuchsia-zircon-sys (BSD-3-Clause) -> https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/garnet/
* kernel32-sys (MIT) -> https://github.com/retep998/winapi-rs
* mac (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/reem/rust-mac.git
* siphasher (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/jedisct1/rust-siphash
* siphasher (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/jedisct1/rust-siphash
* strum (MIT) -> None
* strum_macros (MIT) -> None
* utf-8 (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/SimonSapin/rust-utf8
* void (MIT) -> https://github.com/reem/rust-void.git
* winapi-build (MIT) -> https://github.com/retep998/winapi-rs
* winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/retep998/winapi-rs
* winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) -> https://github.com/retep998/winapi-rs
* ws2_32-sys (MIT) -> https://github.com/retep998/winapi-rs

Still a fair amount, but less than 200 or whatever it started with...

[bollwyvl]

Now running into this on windows:

python dep present in build but not host requirements

... since we use python to do the munging/checking, but don't want any build cruft.

i found this gitter from @isuruf... how'd you "properly" get around this issue?

For now I'm skipping the python-based stuff on windows, as all the win-64 stuff gets pulled in on linux, anyway.

[bollwyvl]

Skipping the license check on windows seems to work fine:

(%PREFIX%) %SRC_DIR%>texlab --version 
texlab 2.2.0

(%PREFIX%) %SRC_DIR%>IF 0 NEQ 0 exit /B 1 

(%PREFIX%) %SRC_DIR%>exit /B 0 

(%PREFIX%) %SRC_DIR%>IF 0 NEQ 0 exit 1 

Resource usage statistics from testing texlab:
   Process count: 1
   CPU time: unavailable
   Memory: 1.5M
   Disk usage: 535B
   Time elapsed: 0:00:02.0

TEST END: C:\Miniconda\conda-bld\win-64\texlab-2.2.0-he32d670_0.tar.bz2

[bollwyvl]

huzzah, back to green with all the licenses.

@conda-forge/staged-recipes have ticked all the boxes i can now...

[scopatz]

Wow! You are a beast @bollwyvl!

[isuruf]

How is checking in unix enough? If there are windows only dependencies, the licenses will be missed.

[bollwyvl]

It pulls a number of win-rs packages (see licenses) that I assume are windows only.... We could take the ten minute hit to build/install the license tester, dump out the json and compare to other architectures. All the checks are just commented out, and do work, but raise that python build dep issue.

[isuruf]

You can fix that by adding compiler('c') to build.

[bollwyvl]

Awesome! Good to know. Will investigate restoring the checks on feedstock.

…

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, 17:48 Isuru Fernando ***@***.***> wrote: You can fix that by adding compiler('c') to build. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12029 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAALCRFCKW5DQDCLQX4D7RDRZED4TANCNFSM4OKT7DKA> .