[wip] Add go-ipfs 0.7.0

[bollwyvl]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
  • the go-licenses approach currently fails as about 10 packages don't have licenses discoverable by go-licenses
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

notes:

• fixes Package go-ipfs #13577

licenses not found by go-licenses

github.com/ipfs/go-verifcid            # has LICENSE-MIT LICENSE-APACHE COPYRIGHT
github.com/ipfs/bbloom                 # has LICENSE
github.com/multiformats/go-base36      # has LICENSE.md
github.com/whyrusleeping/base32        # has LICENSE
github.com/whyrusleeping/cbor-gen      # has LICENSE
github.com/ipld/go-car                 # opened PR for MIT LICENSE
github.com/ipfs/go-cidutil             # opened PR for MIT LICENSE
github.com/ipfs/go-ipld-git            # opened PR for MIT LICENSE
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-asn-util   # opened PR for MIT LICENSE
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-noise      # opened PR for MIT LICENSE

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/go-ipfs) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[bollwyvl]

Looks like OSX needs a newer SDK. Will try windows.

[bollwyvl]

Hm, windows is looking fine. Still don't know what to do about the licenses, short of big stack of upstream PRs, and hoping 0.8.0 ends up pulling them in with proper metadata. I don't see a way to ignore fails for certain packages... maybe it would be possible to inject licenses into the at-rest directories or something... @conda-forge/help-go any thoughts?

[bollwyvl]

Looks like --ignore is in PR... hopefully this will land soon!

[bollwyvl]

Abandoning in favor of #14225