Add recipe for rust-script

[tedil]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

Note: This package has a dual license I'm not sure how to encode that in the meta.yaml. As recommended by @mbargull I now specify it according to SPDX as MIT AND Apache-2.0 (though it might be MIT OR Apache-2.0?); since rust-script copied their licensing from cargo, I guess it's the same issue.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/rust-script) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/rust-script:

• The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
• The recipe must have some tests.
• The test section contained an unexpected subsection name. command is not a valid subsection name.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/rust-script) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/rust-script:

• The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/rust-script) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/rust-script:

• There are too few lines. There should be one empty line at the end of the file.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/rust-script) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/rust-script) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/rust-script:

• License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/rust-script) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[xhochy]

You will also need to add the thirdparty licenses that are installed alongside the main package, see #14985 for an example.

[tedil]

You will also need to add the thirdparty licenses that are installed alongside the main package, see #14985 for an example.

Thanks for the pointer, done ;)