trying singularityce again

[ngam]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/singularityce) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[ngam]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes this is ready to go (only relevant build is on linux_64_centos7)

Please note and provide feedback:

1. This is simply a copy with minor edits of the singularity-feedstock (https://github.com/conda-forge/singularity-feedstock). Sylabs (SingularityCE) forked HPCng's Singularity in May and now they're starting to diverge (confusingly). SingularityCE is backed by a commercial entity (while still open source) and thus their dev seems more focused and speedy. I thought we should add the CE fork feedstock to keep track of the changes and provide both the original and the fork. I am a maintainer on the singularity-feedstock, and I have added a conflict in the recipe here.
2. I am not sure if we have preferences about using singularityce vs singularity-ce (they weirdly use them interchangeably, so I am not sure what you prefer/think is best)
3. I disabled tests that require --privileged flag and will reenable those later when this becomes a feedstock
4. I simply more or less copied from the singularity-feedstock --- is this okay? Do I need to rewrite stuff or like cite or something?

[ngam]

minor edits to bring macos up to speed; and now linux64 cos6 works fine.

[ngam]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes gentle reminder to review this when you have a chance :)

[ocefpaf]

Is there a make check we can run here?

[ngam]

Hi @ocefpaf! I don't think so... or at least I haven't seen it.

For reference,

1. this is our original singularity here at conda-forge: link
2. and this is the dev install docs: link

Do you think we should be adding a make check here as well?

[ocefpaf]

If it is available, yes. I'll leave that to you in the feedstock.