Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Still experimental? #188

Closed
jakirkham opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #189
Closed

Still experimental? #188

jakirkham opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #189
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity severity::4 low; functionality is inconvenient source::community catch-all for issues filed by community members type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type type::documentation request for improved documentation

Comments

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Currently the README notes the conda-libmamba-solver is still experimental. As it has been out for a while now and received a fair bit of testing, am wondering if we would be comfortable dropping the experimental label? Or if we are not ready to do that, what still needs to happen before relaxing that term?

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Given PR ( conda/conda#11889 ) already relaxed this terminology in Conda, maybe updating the README here is more of a formality?

@jezdez
Copy link
Member

jezdez commented Apr 17, 2023

Yeah, this is purely an oversight in the README and can be fixed. The package is not experimental anymore, even though there are a few issues still related to updating, we believe these are well understood and can be fixed in upcoming releases.

@jezdez jezdez added type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type type::documentation request for improved documentation source::community catch-all for issues filed by community members severity::4 low; functionality is inconvenient labels Apr 17, 2023
@jezdez jezdez added this to the May 2023 release milestone Apr 17, 2023
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Jannis! 🙏

Am happy to add PRs anywhere we still find this text (starting with here)

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Submitted PR ( #189 )

@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks John!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Apr 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity severity::4 low; functionality is inconvenient source::community catch-all for issues filed by community members type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type type::documentation request for improved documentation
Projects
Status: Done
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants