Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

maintain download() interface in conda.exports #8698

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 30, 2019

Conversation

kalefranz
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kalefranz kalefranz requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2019 18:35
@soapy1
Copy link
Contributor

soapy1 commented May 20, 2019

I believe the conda-build test failures are not a result of the changes in this PR

@msarahan
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are a mess because the new format stuff is way off. I'm working on it. I'm pretty sure this PR is fine, but it would be nice to clarify without the new format mess, just in case.

@msarahan msarahan added this to the 4.7.1 milestone May 27, 2019
@msarahan
Copy link
Contributor

index is back in shape. Cycling...

@msarahan
Copy link
Contributor

Note: most of the changes here com from #8738 - I've rebased on that so that I can test this PR with the fixes from #8738 until that PR is merged.

Signed-off-by: Kale Franz <kfranz@continuum.io>
@msarahan msarahan merged commit 30a1730 into conda:master May 30, 2019
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi there, thank you for your contribution to Conda!

This pull request has been automatically locked since it has not had recent activity after it was closed.

Please open a new issue or pull request if needed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Aug 27, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants