You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2021. It is now read-only.
conjure-up apparently uses single-word petnames for Juju models it
creates, e.g.:
| james@malefic:~$ juju models
| Controller: lxd
|
| Model Cloud/Region Status Machines Cores Access Last connection
| controller localhost/localhost available 1 - admin just now
| default localhost/localhost available 0 - admin 2017-01-02
| dane* localhost/localhost available 4 - admin 6 minutes ago
|
| james@malefic:~$
A bare pet name is pretty confusing and would only get more so if you
conjured up multiple spells. At a minimum, I think the spell should
be indicated in some way in the model name (perhaps combined with a
petname, if you need to avoid clashes). It might also be useful to
indicate in some way that this is a conjure-up model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
conjure-up apparently uses single-word petnames for Juju models it
creates, e.g.:
A bare pet name is pretty confusing and would only get more so if you
conjured up multiple spells. At a minimum, I think the spell should
be indicated in some way in the model name (perhaps combined with a
petname, if you need to avoid clashes). It might also be useful to
indicate in some way that this is a conjure-up model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: