Correct calculation of Jacobian in prediction step for worksheet 4 #6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@varunbachalli highlighted in #5 that the Jacobian in this prediction step is wrong. More about jacobians can be found here https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Calculus/Supplemental_Modules_(Calculus)/Vector_Calculus/3%3A_Multiple_Integrals/3.8%3A_Jacobians
|
I would like someone else to review this by means of a quick coherence check to ensure all is correct prior to my merge, please As it has been many years since I have touched this project! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@varunbachalli highlighted in #5 that the Jacobian in the prediction step to worksheet 4 was being calculated incorrectly.
More about Jacobians can be found here: