Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security] Bump puma from 4.3.1 to 4.3.3 #3934

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2020

Conversation

dependabot-preview[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Bumps puma from 4.3.1 to 4.3.3. This update includes security fixes.

Vulnerabilities fixed

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability in puma If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

Patched versions: ~> 3.12.4; >= 4.3.3 Unaffected versions: none

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects puma In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and 3.12.2, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF or/r, /n) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.

While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).

This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.

This has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.

Affected versions: >= 4.0.0, < 4.3.2

Changelog

Sourced from puma's changelog.

4.3.3 and 3.12.4 / 2020-02-28

  • Bugfixes
    • Fix: Fixes a problem where we weren't splitting headers correctly on newlines (#2132)
  • Security
    • Fix: Prevent HTTP Response splitting via CR in early hints.

4.3.2 and 3.12.3 / 2020-02-27

  • Security
    • Fix: Prevent HTTP Response splitting via CR/LF in header values. CVE-2020-5247.
Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot badge me will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme

Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot dashboard:

  • Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
  • Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
  • Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies)
  • Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
  • Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)

Bumps [puma](https://github.com/puma/puma) from 4.3.1 to 4.3.3. **This update includes security fixes.**
- [Release notes](https://github.com/puma/puma/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/puma/puma/blob/master/History.md)
- [Commits](puma/puma@v4.3.1...v4.3.3)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
@dependabot-preview dependabot-preview bot added dependencies Pull requests that updates a dependency security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability labels Mar 1, 2020
@javierm javierm added this to Reviewing in Roadmap via automation Mar 2, 2020
@javierm javierm moved this from Reviewing to Testing in Roadmap Mar 2, 2020
@javierm javierm merged commit 0b33768 into master Mar 4, 2020
Roadmap automation moved this from Testing to Release 1.1.0 Mar 4, 2020
@javierm javierm deleted the dependabot/bundler/puma-4.3.3 branch March 4, 2020 12:55
smarques pushed a commit to venetochevogliamo/consul that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2020
…r/puma-4.3.3

[Security] Bump puma from 4.3.1 to 4.3.3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that updates a dependency security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability
Projects
No open projects
Roadmap
  
Release 1.1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant