New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin to libseccomp 2.3.3 #3575
Pin to libseccomp 2.3.3 #3575
Conversation
lib seccomp 2.4 has huge performance regressions. This change pins to 2.3.3 where that is not an issue Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
d806788
to
b5f03ea
Compare
Build succeeded.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3575 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 42.26% 42.26%
=======================================
Files 126 126
Lines 13881 13881
=======================================
Hits 5867 5867
Misses 7128 7128
Partials 886 886
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
do we need this in our packaging scripts as well? /cc @seemethere |
@thaJeztah not at the moment |
👍 thx |
lib seccomp 2.4 has huge performance regressions.
This change pins to 2.3.3 where that is not an issue
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby crosbymichael@gmail.com