Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use lower TTL for contianer entries #312

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2023

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Mar 31, 2023

Containers can be short lived. We should not allow callers to cache the entry for to long. We could consider turning of cachine all together with a TTL of 0 but 60 seconds seems like a good tradeoff so the clients can still do some caching and not have to request the name every single time.

ref containers/netavark#644

Containers can be short lived. We should not allow callers to cache the
entry for to long. We could consider turning of cachine all together
with a TTL of 0 but 60 seconds seems like a good tradeoff so the
clients can still do some caching and not have to request the name
every single time.

ref containers/netavark#644

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 31, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Mar 31, 2023

@flouthoc @mheon @baude PTAL

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Mar 31, 2023

yes LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Mar 31, 2023

Sure
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 31, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6c48930 into containers:main Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants