Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI:DOCS] Fix typos and improve language #3745

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 26, 2022

Conversation

eriksjolund
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Erik Sjölund erik.sjolund@gmail.com

What type of PR is this?

/kind api-change
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind deprecation
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake
/kind other

What this PR does / why we need it:

How to verify it

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Signed-off-by: Erik Sjölund <erik.sjolund@gmail.com>
@eriksjolund
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe I shouldn't have added the [CI:DOCS] because of the modification in cmd/buildah/source.go ...

@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ The secret needs to be passed to the build using the --secret flag. The final im
If you use the shell form of the **CMD**, the `<command>` executes in `/bin/sh -c`:

Note that the exec form is parsed as a JSON array, which means that you must
use double-quotes (") around words not single-quotes (').
use double-quotes (") around words, not single-quotes (').
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just noting that #3746 and containers/common#905 are moving this file from Buildah to c/common. We should ensure these changes move too. @Foxboron FYI

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can produce a very ad-hoc patch and apply on top of my branch so @eriksjolund get author credit there :)

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

Awesome changes @eriksjolund TYVM! I'm really shocked by the "using using" bit in so many places.
One comment for consideration, then you may need to have a merge dance with @Foxboron for the containerfile related files.

@Foxboron
Copy link
Contributor

@TomSweeneyRedHat Feel free to merge these first. I'll do a rebase and include a patch with these changes (where relevant) on top of my change :) Thanks!

Co-authored-by: Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
@eriksjolund
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there anything I should do?
The extra commit
d92da92
looks good but it is marked with a red cross. Please guide me.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 26, 2022

Could you pull both and merge them

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 26, 2022

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eriksjolund, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhatdan rhatdan merged commit 61579f4 into containers:main Jan 26, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 26, 2022

I decided to force merge.

@eriksjolund
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhatdan Thanks for merging

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants