Fix inspect to display multiple label: changes #6752
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If the user runs a container like
podman run --security-opt seccomp=unconfined --security-opt label=type:spc_t --security-opt label=level:s0 ...
Podman inspect was only showing the second option
This change will show
"SecurityOpt": [
"label=type:spc_t,label=level:s0:c60",
"seccomp=unconfined"
],
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
@mheon PTAL |
|
LGTM, thanks |
|
LGTM |
|
/lgtm |
I agree with Tom. If we merge fixes without adding tests, we very likely forget about them and may regress in the future again. |
|
But I shouldn't complain without getting the hands dirty myself ... #6767 adds a test for it |
edsantiago
added a commit
to edsantiago/libpod
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2020
Followup to containers#6761: confirm that 'podman ps' shows the ports on a running container in a pod created with -p (not to be confused with the container itself running with -p, tested in 500-networking.bats). While we're at it, test that the port handling itself works, by sending random text to the container and making sure the container receives it. Followup to containers#6752: 'podman inspect' should show multiple security opts Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
edsantiago
added a commit
to edsantiago/libpod
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2020
Followup to containers#6761: confirm that 'podman ps' shows the ports on a running container in a pod created with -p (not to be confused with the container itself running with -p, tested in 500-networking.bats). While we're at it, test that the port handling itself works, by sending random text to the container and making sure the container receives it. Followup to containers#6752: 'podman inspect' should show multiple security opts Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
github-actions
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the user runs a container like
podman run --security-opt seccomp=unconfined --security-opt label=type:spc_t --security-opt label=level:s0 ...
Podman inspect was only showing the second option
This change will show
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh dwalsh@redhat.com