Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix race conditions in rootless cni setup #10939

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Jul 15, 2021

There was an race condition when calling GetRootlessCNINetNs(). It
created the rootless cni directory before it got locked. Therefore
another process could have called cleanup and removed this directory
before it was used resulting in errors. The lockfile got moved into the
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR directory to prevent a panic when the parent dir was
removed by the cleanup.

Fixes #10930
Fixes #10922

To make this even more robust GetRootlessCNINetNs() will now return
locked. This guarantees that we can run Do() after GetRootlessCNINetNs()
before another process could have called Cleanup() in between.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 15, 2021
libpod/networking_linux.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libpod/networking_linux.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
There was an race condition when calling `GetRootlessCNINetNs()`. It
created the rootless cni directory before it got locked. Therefore
another process could have called cleanup and removed this directory
before it was used resulting in errors. The lockfile got moved into the
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR directory to prevent a panic when the parent dir was
removed by cleanup.

Fixes containers#10930
Fixes containers#10922

To make this even more robust `GetRootlessCNINetNs()` will now return
locked. This guarantees that we can run `Do()` after `GetRootlessCNINetNs()`
before another process could have called `Cleanup()` in between.

[NO TESTS NEEDED] CI is flaking, hopefully this will fix it.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jul 15, 2021

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2021
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jul 15, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 15, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d24fc6b into containers:main Jul 15, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the rootless-cni branch July 15, 2021 16:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
4 participants