Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Translate Memory Limit to Swap in API #13839

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2022

Conversation

cdoern
Copy link
Collaborator

@cdoern cdoern commented Apr 12, 2022

In specgen, the CLI creation route uses the given memory limit to define the swap value (if not already specified). added a route to this piece of code from within the api handlers

resolves #13145

Signed-off-by: cdoern cbdoer23@g.holycross.edu

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Apr 12, 2022

@ttys3 PTAL

@cdoern
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cdoern commented Apr 12, 2022

@jwhonce am I passing the limits incorrectly here? this works when I directly access the API via my command line but memory seems to be nil in these tests.

@rhatdan rhatdan changed the title Tanslate Memory Limit to Swap in API Translate Memory Limit to Swap in API Apr 14, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Apr 14, 2022

@cdoern please fix your commit message on your next push. Tanslate -> Translate.

@cdoern cdoern force-pushed the swap branch 2 times, most recently from c65151d to fd34b90 Compare April 18, 2022 02:41
in specgen, CLI path uses the given memory limit to define the swap value (if not already specified)
add a route to this piece of code from within the api handlers

resolves containers#13145

Signed-off-by: cdoern <cdoern@redhat.com>
@cdoern
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cdoern commented Apr 18, 2022

rebased as the only test failure was some repetitive flake. @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Apr 18, 2022

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 19, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cdoern, giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 19, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Apr 19, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 712c3bb into containers:main Apr 19, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
4 participants