New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cirrus: Remove multi-arch skopeo image builds #2093
Conversation
176cc38
to
9a04f76
Compare
I’m afraid I haven’t been really paying attention to these If it’s the last one, |
No worries, I added a link in the PR description. Yes, I spent weeks debugging and likely weeks more are needed. It's entirely possible that future build automation will use a new script or no script at all. I haven't decided yet. In all cases, the builds can't happen in cirrus for other reasons, so might as well clobber it.
The same (probably?) jq problem was happening in all podman, buildah and skopeo build automation. So I don't think the image source or docs needs any changes at the moment. |
ACK.
The other two repos don’t point at For Skopeo, eventually we need to decide if we are going to continue to provide container images (somehow), or not — and if not, the documentation needs to stop advertising them. Eventually; this is not urgent, new releases only happen every few months; but if we, after a time, ended up pointing users at year-old releases, that would not be ideal. |
I agree. My intention is to replace the build automation. I think that's most helpful for the users. Might be a good idea to sign the images as well, but that may be a further update later on. |
These jobs have been failing since early August due to technical/scripting problems. Disable/remove entirely since a fix is unlikely to be implemented anytime soon. Signed-off-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
9a04f76
to
9e89e18
Compare
Force-push: Rebased. This should be ready to go. |
I’m mildly worried about us stopping to build them, and continuing to point users at old unmaintained software. Can we leave a traceable trail, at least? Is there a WIP of the new replacement somewhere? If not, I can open a Skopeo issue to track the situation and we can link to it here. |
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, those FQINs are all still valid. Recent images were built and pushed there manually (unless I forgot? I haven't checked). This PR just disables/removes the (broken since August) built automation. Re-implementing that is number-2 on my hot-list right behind adding a "make sure credentials can't leak" check. |
(I think 1.13.3 is missing (but the difference between 1.13.2 and 1.13.3 is irrelevant). Dan has also been tagging releases this week…) Either way, I have filed #2110 , the stale bot will eventually remind me to revisit. |
Good idea. Thanks. |
These jobs have been failing since early August due to technical/scripting problems. Disable/remove entirely since a fix is unlikely to be implemented anytime soon.
If anybody ever cares, I gave up trying to debug the script problem in containers/podman#19720.