Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix integration test validation CI, make io_priority test conditional #2707

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2024

Conversation

YJDoc2
Copy link
Collaborator

@YJDoc2 YJDoc2 commented Feb 26, 2024

After the name change of integration test to contest, this CI file was missed, and as a result we didn't validate the tests even when there was a change in them.

I think implementation of io_priority in runc is still pending on opencontainers/runc#3783 , so made them condition with runc check.

Signed-off-by: Yashodhan Joshi <yjdoc2@gmail.com>
@lengrongfu
Copy link
Collaborator

when this pr opencontainers/runc#3783 merge after, we should delete Box::new(|| !is_runtime_runc()), this line of code?

@YJDoc2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

YJDoc2 commented Feb 27, 2024

when this pr opencontainers/runc#3783 merge after, we should delete Box::new(|| !is_runtime_runc()), this line of code?

Not just PR merge, this also needs to be released by runc in one of their releases. For example, right now they have domainname support on their main, but not in any released versions. Once they release any version with the PR code, we can update runc version in our CI and change the rust test code to previous.

@YJDoc2 YJDoc2 mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2024
@YJDoc2 YJDoc2 merged commit cfa2ea9 into containers:main Feb 27, 2024
30 checks passed
@YJDoc2 YJDoc2 deleted the fix_contest_validation_ci branch February 27, 2024 05:57
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants