x86_64 support

[danimesq]

No description provided.

[copy]

It would be nice to have, but it's a huge project and I won't find enough time any time soon to work on it.

I'll leave this open, if someone wants to work on this I can help you get started.

[danimesq]

Before implement it, is better make v86 to support Windows XP.

[czenzel]

@copy I read you are experimenting with Web Assembly on issue #170? Do you have a sneak peek we can take a look at? I am ready to experiment!

[copy]

@copy I read you are experimenting with Web Assembly on issue #170? Do you have a sneak peek we can take a look at? I am ready to experiment!

Not yet.

[Darker]

What are the things that would need to be changed to make this work?

[Broyojo]

Lots of things, the processor is only an i386 processor.

…

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jakub Mareda ***@***.***> wrote: What are the things that would need to be changed to make this work? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#133 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATdq-trZZUrXIKvOf6Dv8qllizHGrNvXks5tpfXbgaJpZM4MMgdZ> .

[Broyojo]

It would be cool if we could change it to an amd64 cpu

…

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: Lots of things, the processor is only an i386 processor. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jakub Mareda ***@***.***> wrote: > What are the things that would need to be changed to make this work? > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#133 (comment)>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATdq-trZZUrXIKvOf6Dv8qllizHGrNvXks5tpfXbgaJpZM4MMgdZ> > . >

[Broyojo]

You would have to change the architexture and the clock speed to run even some 64 bit operatin systems

…

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: It would be cool if we could change it to an amd64 cpu On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: > Lots of things, the processor is only an i386 processor. > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jakub Mareda ***@***.***> > wrote: > >> What are the things that would need to be changed to make this work? >> >> — >> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> <#133 (comment)>, or mute >> the thread >> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATdq-trZZUrXIKvOf6Dv8qllizHGrNvXks5tpfXbgaJpZM4MMgdZ> >> . >> >

[Broyojo]

architecture

…

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:15 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: > You would have to change the architecture and the clock speed to run even > some 64 bit operatin systems > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: > >> It would be cool if we could change it to an amd64 cpu >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM Broyojo ***@***.***> wrote: >> >>> Lots of things, the processor is only an i386 processor. >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jakub Mareda ***@***.***> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> What are the things that would need to be changed to make this work? >>>> >>>> — >>>> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. >>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >>>> <#133 (comment)>, or mute >>>> the thread >>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATdq-trZZUrXIKvOf6Dv8qllizHGrNvXks5tpfXbgaJpZM4MMgdZ> >>>> . >>>> >>>

[sr229]

Reminder v86 emulates only x86 instruction sets, I don't see why would we emulate x86_64 since its more modern and techincally you can just grab a whole PC today

[tlrobinson]

This would be awesome, if only to get TempleOS running.

[samdenty]

https://github.com/ktock/container2wasm