Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a regression test for "Allow catching of WrongAbstractionType, fixing a regression from 8.4 … git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16389 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7" #3022

Closed
coqbot opened this issue Apr 6, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
part: tactics platform: Windows This is a Windows specific issue.

Comments

@coqbot
Copy link
Contributor

coqbot commented Apr 6, 2013

Note: the issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github tool

Original bug ID: BZ#3022
From: @JasonGross
Reported version: 8.5
CC: @JasonGross, @ppedrot

@coqbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

coqbot commented Apr 6, 2013

Comment author: @JasonGross

The most recent commit on trunk was the result of my bug report at HoTT#28.

The following code serves as a regression test for this bug (at least for now), if you want to include it as a test case

Goal forall (O obj : Type) (f : O -> obj) (x : O) (e : x = x)
(T : obj -> obj -> Type) (m : forall x0 : obj, T x0 x0),
match eq_sym e in (_ = y) return (T (f y) (f x)) with
| eq_refl => m (f x)
end = m (f x).
intros.
try case e.

@coqbot coqbot closed this as completed Apr 8, 2013
@coqbot coqbot added part: tactics platform: Windows This is a Windows specific issue. labels Oct 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
part: tactics platform: Windows This is a Windows specific issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant