New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ltac, move:, and name resolution #6687
Labels
part: ssreflect
The SSReflect proof language.
Comments
@gares It seems like you had started working on this issue. What stopped you? |
I've opened #8314 with that commit, it needs a rebase I guess. |
Actually, it seems that
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A name, that is bound in a Ltac tactic, fails to be resolved when the tactic is used in a different module. A minimal non-working example follows. The expected behavior is the one of
generalize
, so it seems a bug related to themove:
tactic.Versions
The Coq Proof Assistant, version 8.7.1 (January 2018)
compiled on Jan 20 2018 9:56:24 with OCaml 4.04.2
The Coq Proof Assistant, version 8.8+alpha (February 2018)
compiled on Feb 2 2018 13:36:42 with OCaml 4.04.2
Operating system
macOS
Description of the problem
a.v
b.v
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: