Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #18342: try to insert an entry coercion when a notation in a custom entry has arguments #18447

Conversation

herbelin
Copy link
Member

@herbelin herbelin commented Dec 30, 2023

There was an anomaly while coercion entries could have instead been inserted.

Fixes / closes #18342

  • Added / updated test-suite.
  • Added changelog.

… arguments.

Then, don't create a dummy application to no arguments.
No semantic changes a priori.
@herbelin herbelin added kind: fix This fixes a bug or incorrect documentation. part: notations The notation system. kind: enhancement Enhancement to an existing user-facing feature, tactic, etc. part: custom The custom notation system. labels Dec 30, 2023
@herbelin herbelin added this to the 8.20+rc1 milestone Dec 30, 2023
@herbelin herbelin requested a review from a team as a code owner December 30, 2023 10:32
@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot added the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label Dec 30, 2023
@herbelin herbelin added request: full CI Use this label when you want your next push to trigger a full CI. and removed needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. labels Dec 30, 2023
herbelin added a commit to herbelin/github-coq that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2023
@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot removed the request: full CI Use this label when you want your next push to trigger a full CI. label Dec 30, 2023
@herbelin herbelin force-pushed the master+fix18342-insert-entry-coercion-applied-custom-notation branch from f351e77 to 8c80d32 Compare December 31, 2023 09:13
@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot added the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label Dec 31, 2023
@proux01
Copy link
Contributor

proux01 commented Jan 8, 2024

@coqbot run full ci

@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot removed the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label Jan 8, 2024
@proux01 proux01 self-assigned this Jan 9, 2024
@proux01
Copy link
Contributor

proux01 commented Jan 9, 2024

@coqbot merge now

Copy link
Contributor

coqbot-app bot commented Jan 9, 2024

@proux01: You can't merge the PR because it hasn't been approved yet.

@proux01
Copy link
Contributor

proux01 commented Jan 9, 2024

@coqbot merge now

@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot merged commit 47814ff into coq:master Jan 9, 2024
6 checks passed
louiseddp pushed a commit to louiseddp/coq that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: enhancement Enhancement to an existing user-facing feature, tactic, etc. kind: fix This fixes a bug or incorrect documentation. part: custom The custom notation system. part: notations The notation system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Anomaly in constrexpr with custom entry
2 participants