Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

(Roman Danyliw's comment on 6.5.3:) Clarify how early allocations are envisioned #168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2023
Merged

(Roman Danyliw's comment on 6.5.3:) Clarify how early allocations are envisioned #168

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions draft-ietf-core-sid.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -783,8 +783,9 @@ The allocation policy is Expert review. The Expert MUST ensure that the followin
### Recursive Allocation of YANG SID Range at Document Adoption {#recursive-allocation-at-adoption}

Due to the difficulty in changing SID values during IETF document processing,
it is expected that most documents will ask for SID allocations using Early
Allocations {{BCP100}}. The details of the Early Allocation should be included
it is expected that most documents will ask for SID range allocations using Early
Allocations {{BCP100}}. The details of the Early Allocation to be
requested, including the timeline envisioned, should be included
in any Working Group Adoption call. Prior to Working Group Adoption, an internet
draft author can use the experimental SID range (as per
{{ietf-iana-sid-range-allocation-policy}}) for their SIDs allocations or
Expand Down