core: Mark all repos as "modular hotfixes" #1961
Conversation
|
I wrote this on top of #1959 so we have CI coverage, but I can split it out if we're not ready to merge that one yet. |
|
To clarify, I'm not super happy with this. Another approach I was tempted to do was going the opposite way and disabling modules entirely. We couldn't do this before because FCOS used modules for a few of its Rust packages, but those have been demodularized now. (But then we'll want to make sure we address #1435 before the need to include modules comes up again.) |
This is a follow-up hack to coreos#1797 to force libdnf to let us use modular packages as if they were regular packages until we actually support modules correctly (coreos#1435). A repo marked as a modular hotfix means that libdnf doesn't try to filter out modular RPMs from the repo as it usually does. Resolves: https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/717
jlebon
force-pushed
the
pr/modular-hotfixes
branch
from
06c02b7
to
e97b4e9
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, jlebon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Note follow-up to this at: rpm-software-management/libdnf#885 |
This is a follow-up hack to #1797 to force libdnf to let us use modular
packages as if they were regular packages until we actually support
modules correctly (#1435).
A repo marked as a modular hotfix means that libdnf doesn't try to
filter out modular RPMs from the repo as it usually does.
Resolves: https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/717