-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build(deps): bump anyhow from 1.0.32 to 1.0.33 in /rust #2253
build(deps): bump anyhow from 1.0.32 to 1.0.33 in /rust #2253
Conversation
Bumps [anyhow](https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow) from 1.0.32 to 1.0.33. - [Release notes](https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/releases) - [Commits](dtolnay/anyhow@1.0.32...1.0.33) Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
Hi @dependabot-preview[bot]. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a coreos member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
/lgtm |
We were composing f31, which has now been untagged from the pool now that FCOS is working on moving to f33 (see coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker#609 (comment)). Bump the commit to test here (this is the HEAD of `testing-devel` at the time of this writing).
Note I've added a commit here to fix CI. ⬆️ /lgtm |
Hmm interesting, a bunch of compose tests failed with:
Not sure what's going on there. |
Me neither, I suspect something else is going wrong and this is just a confusing failure mode for it. I submitted coreos/coreos-assembler#1786 related to this. |
Ahh I think I know what's going on here. The compose test doesn't have the bits from cosa that commits the overlays to the OSTree repo and injects it into the manifest. Fixing. |
The temptation to basically nuke most of our compose tests and all of the duplication/overlap we have with coreos-assembler is...powerful. |
This lit up in my editor which does linting in the background.
Now that we've bumped to the latest FCOS commit for compose tests, one thing that came up was that our compose tests never actually included FCOS overlays in the compose the way cosa does. This then cause compose failures because one of the postprocess scripts expects those files there. Let's just nuke all postprocess scripts here to work around this. I initially wanted to import the overlay logic from cosa, but overlays only work in unified core mode, and sadly we still want some coverage in non-unified mode until that's fully dropped. And anyway, we also already do a proper `cosa build` in the vmcheck branch of CI so it's not like we're losing that coverage. Down the line though, I think this is a good argument for folding the overlay dirs into rpm-ostree more natively as discussed here: coreos/coreos-assembler#639 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, dependabot-preview[bot], jlebon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Yeah... though OTOH I think this would require making the cosa compose process more configurable (see original commit message in #1959). |
Something changed format, not sure what.
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
In f32, ping is no longer privileged since it ships with the sysctl for `ping_group_range` which allows unpriv pings. Check the file caps of arping instead, which does still use them.
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Bumps anyhow from 1.0.32 to 1.0.33.
Release notes
Sourced from anyhow's releases.
Commits
840afd8
Release 1.0.33f9d7516
Merge pull request #114 from dtolnay/macrodocbcdec88
Link frombail!
andensure!
toanyhow!
ec15c61
Link frombail!
andensure!
to anyhow::Error5ec6713
Call out thatbail!
andensure!
require anyhow::Error in the return type75f57ed
Fix the expression thatbail!
andensure!
are equivalent to9a95ce8
Link fromanyhow!
to anyhow::Error693ca21
Mention std::error::Error specialization behavior ofanyhow!
f27588e
Indicate thatanyhow!
is not just for strings33894b6
Remove feature="std" inside code that is already feature="std"Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase
.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebase
will rebase this PR@dependabot recreate
will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot merge
will merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and merge
will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel merge
will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopen
will reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot close
will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependency
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot use these labels
will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot use these reviewers
will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot use these assignees
will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot use this milestone
will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot badge me
will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readmeAdditionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot dashboard: