Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add well known deployment problems #111

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
104 changes: 63 additions & 41 deletions content/operation/known_issues.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,64 +7,86 @@ chapter: false

> There are some *known issues* with CRS and some of its compatible WAF engines. This page describes these issues. Get in touch if you think something is missing.

- There are still **false positives** for standard web applications in the default install (paranoia level 1). Please [report these on GitHub](https://github.com/coreruleset/coreruleset/issues/new/choose) if and when encountered.
{{% notice warning %}}
There are still **false positives** for standard web applications in the default install (paranoia level 1). Please [report these on GitHub](https://github.com/coreruleset/coreruleset/issues/new/choose) if and when encountered.
{{% /notice %}}

False positives from paranoia level 2 and higher are considered to be less interesting, as it is expected that users will write exclusion rules for their alerts in the higher paranoia levels. Nevertheless, false positives from higher paranoia levels can still be reported and the CRS project will try to find a generic solution for them.
👉 False positives from paranoia level 2 and higher are considered to be less interesting, as it is expected that users will write exclusion rules for their alerts in the higher paranoia levels. Nevertheless, false positives from higher paranoia levels can still be reported and the CRS project will try to find a generic solution for them.

- **Apache** may give an error on startup when the CRS is loaded:
### AH00111: Config variable ${...} is not defined

```
AH00111: Config variable ${[^} is not defined
```
**Apache** may give an error on startup when the CRS is loaded:

It appears that Apache tries to be smart by trying to evaluate a config variable. This notice should be a warning and can be safely ignored. The problem has been investigated and a solution has not been found yet.
```
AH00111: Config variable ${[^} is not defined
```

- **ModSecurity 3.0.0-3.0.2** will give an error:
It appears that Apache tries to be smart by trying to evaluate a config variable. This notice should be a warning and can be safely ignored. The problem has been investigated and a solution has not been found yet.

```
Expecting an action, got: ctl:requestBodyProcessor=URLENCODED"`
```
### **ModSecurity 3.0.0-3.0.2** will give an error

Support for the URLENCODED body processor was only added in ModSecurity 3.0.3. To resolve this, upgrade to ModSecurity 3.0.3 or higher.
```
Expecting an action, got: ctl:requestBodyProcessor=URLENCODED"`
```

- **Debian** releases up to and including Jessie lack YAJL/JSON support in ModSecurity. This causes the following error in the Apache ErrorLog or SecAuditLog:
Support for the URLENCODED body processor was only added in ModSecurity 3.0.3. To resolve this, upgrade to ModSecurity 3.0.3 or higher.

```
ModSecurity: JSON support was not enabled.
```
### Old Debian versions without YAJL

JSON support was enabled in Debian's package version 2.8.0-4 (Nov 2014). To resolve this, it is possible to either use `backports.debian.org` to install the latest ModSecurity
release or to disable the rule with ID 200001.
**Debian** releases up to and including Jessie lack YAJL/JSON support in ModSecurity. This causes the following error in the Apache ErrorLog or SecAuditLog:

- **Apache 2.4 prior to 2.4.11** is affected by a bug in parsing multi-line configuration directives, which causes Apache to fail during startup with an error such as:
```
ModSecurity: JSON support was not enabled.
```

```plaintext
Error parsing actions: Unknown action: \\
Action 'configtest' failed.`
```
JSON support was enabled in Debian's package version 2.8.0-4 (Nov 2014). To resolve this, it is possible to either use `backports.debian.org` to install the latest ModSecurity
release or to disable the rule with ID 200001.

This bug is known to plague RHEL/Centos 7 below v7.4 or httpd v2.4.6 release 67 and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS users. (The original bug report can be found at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910\).
### Apache 2.4 prior to 2.4.11 ###

It is advisable to upgrade an affected Apache version. If upgrading is not possible, the CRS project provides a script in the `util/join-multiline-rules` directory which converts the rules into a format that works around the bug. This script must be re-run whenever the CRS rules are modified or updated.
Apache versions prior to 2.4.11 are affected by a bug in parsing multi-line configuration directives, which causes Apache to fail during startup with an error such as:

- As of CRS version 3.0.1, support has been added for the `application/soap+xml` MIME type by default, as specified in RFC 3902. **OF IMPORTANCE:** application/soap+xml is indicative that XML will be provided. In accordance with this, ModSecurity's XML request body processor should also be configured to support this MIME type. Within the ModSecurity project, [commit 5e4e2af](https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/commit/5e4e2af7a6f07854fee6ed36ef4a381d4e03960e) has been merged to support this endeavor. However, if running a modified or preexisting version of the modsecurity.conf file provided by this repository, it is a good idea to upgrade rule '200000' accordingly. The rule now appears as follows:
```plaintext
Error parsing actions: Unknown action: \\
Action 'configtest' failed.`
```

This bug is known to plague RHEL/Centos 7 below v7.4 or httpd v2.4.6 release 67 and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS users. (The original bug report can be found at <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910\>).

By now you should not be using such an old web server. It is advisable to upgrade your Apache version. If upgrading is not possible, the CRS project provides a script in the `util/join-multiline-rules` directory which converts the rules into a format that works around the bug. This script must be re-run whenever the CRS rules are modified or updated.

### Support for `application/soap+xml`

As of CRS version 3.0.1, support has been added for the `application/soap+xml` MIME type by default, as specified in RFC 3902. **OF IMPORTANCE:** application/soap+xml is indicative that XML will be provided. In accordance with this, ModSecurity's XML request body processor should also be configured to support this MIME type. Within the ModSecurity project, [commit 5e4e2af](https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/commit/5e4e2af7a6f07854fee6ed36ef4a381d4e03960e) has been merged to support this endeavor. However, if running a modified or preexisting version of the modsecurity.conf file provided by this repository, it is a good idea to upgrade rule '200000' accordingly. The rule now appears as follows:

```
SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "(?:application(?:/soap\+|/)|text/)xml" \
"id:'200000',phase:1,t:none,t:lowercase,pass,nolog,ctl:requestBodyProcessor=XML"
```

### `SecDisableBackendCompression` not supported in libmodsecurity3

All versions of libmodsecurity3 [do not support](https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/wiki/Reference-Manual-(v3.x)#secdisablebackendcompression) the `SecDisableBackendCompression` directive at all ###

```
SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "(?:application(?:/soap\+|/)|text/)xml" \
"id:'200000',phase:1,t:none,t:lowercase,pass,nolog,ctl:requestBodyProcessor=XML"
```
- **All versions of libmodsecurity3** [do not support](https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/wiki/Reference-Manual-(v3.x)#secdisablebackendcompression) the `SecDisableBackendCompression` directive at all.
If Nginx is acting as a proxy and the backend supports any type of compression, if the client sends an `Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,...` or `TE` header, the backend will return the response in a compressed format. Because of this, the engine cannot verify the response. As a workaround, you need to override the `Accept-Encoding` and `TE` headers in the proxy:

```
server {
server_name foo.com;
```nginx
server {
server_name foo.com;
...
location / {
proxy_pass http://backend;
...
location / {
proxy_pass http://backend;
...
proxy_set_header Accept-Encoding "";
proxy_set_header TE "";
}
proxy_set_header Accept-Encoding "";
proxy_set_header TE "";
}
```
}
```

### Anomaly Mode Doesn't Work

Sometimes on IIS or Nginx users run into an instance where anomaly mode doesn't work as expected. In fact upon careful inspection of logs one would notice that rules don't fire in the order we would expect. In general this is a result of using the `'*'` operator within these environments as it does not act the same way as in Apache. In general within both Apache and IIS one should expliticly include the various files present within the OWASP CRS instead of using the `'*'`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general within both Apache and IIS should probably be Nginx and IIS.

Also: Does this problem persist with newer versions? Because if it does, our INSTALL that proposes * now is likely wrong.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sadly, I do not have a clue. This was copied from the Website 🤷 . Maybe we need to clean this out?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@airween what is the real status of Include rules/*.conf on Nginx?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, what do you mean about "real status"?

The mentioned configuration (Include rules/*.conf) on Nginx works as well, I use that form all of my servers.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought so. That means this passage here can be omitted and we should update the website too.


### Webserver returns error after CRS install

This is likley due to a rule triggering. For instance in some cases a rule is enabled that prohibits access via an IP address. Depending on your [SecDefaultAction](<https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/wiki/Reference-Manual-(v2.x)#SecDefaultAction>) and [SecRuleEngine](<https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/wiki/Reference-Manual-(v2.x)#SecRuleEngine>) configurations, this may result in a redirect loop or a status code. If this is the problem you are experiencing you should consult your error.log (or event viewer for IIS). From this location you candetermine the offending rule and add an exception if neccessary see [false positives and tuning]({{< ref "../concepts/false_positives_tuning.md" >}}).