Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(StackViewport): weird interaction between scroll() and setImageIdIndex() #1208

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jobunk
Copy link

@jobunk jobunk commented Apr 15, 2024

Context

I had encountered an issue in the StackViewport class, where the user would scroll, afterwards use the public method "setImageIdIndex()" to jump to a specific image and then continue scrolling. The expected behavior in this situation would be to that the viewport continues scrolling from the image that the user just jumped to. However the actual behavior was that the scrolling would pick up back where the user had last scrolled and completely ignore the "setImageIdIndex()" that had happened.

Changes & Results

This happens because "this.targetImageIdIndex", which is used during scrolling, was never updated. My workaround was to just use the "setStack()" method instead, since it actually updates "this.targetImageIdIndex" correctly. However I believe that that is not the intended use of the method, so here is my suggested fix. It adds an optional boolean that tells the viewport to also move the scrolling position to the given index. This boolean is optional, because the method is also called from within scroll(), in which case we don't want to adjust the targetImageIdIndex.

Testing

I only tested it locally in the context of my project. The idea is to scroll to an image, then jump to another image far away using "setImageIdIndex(, true)" and then continue scrolling. If the scrolling picks up from the position that you jumped to, the error has been fixed. I also didn't see any weird behavior with other functions, which makes sense, since it's an optional input parameter that was added.

Checklist

PR

  • My Pull Request title is descriptive, accurate and follows the
    semantic-release format and guidelines.

Code

Public Documentation Updates

  • The documentation page has been updated as necessary for any public API
    additions or removals.

Sorry I'm not sure if this is needed here.

Tested Environment

  • "OS: Windows
  • "Node version: v20.12.2
  • "Browser: Firefox

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Deploy Preview for cornerstone-3d-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d6139f2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/cornerstone-3d-docs/deploys/661d63c9c29df2000882811f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1208--cornerstone-3d-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@jobunk jobunk changed the title Fix weird interaction between scroll() and setImageIdIndex() in StackViewport fix(StackViewport): weird interaction between scroll() and setImageIdIndex() Apr 16, 2024
@jobunk
Copy link
Author

jobunk commented Apr 16, 2024

@sedghi Could you review this? Sorry that I can't provide more for the testing part. If something is unclear I'm happy to provide further explanation.

@sedghi
Copy link
Member

sedghi commented May 15, 2024

If the scrolling picks up from the position that you jumped to, the error has been fixed.

I don't think that is the correct behavior. The scroll should not depend on the state (where it was jumped) and should only scroll in the requested direction.

It seems like you are injecting your app-level logic into the library, which is usually not a good idea.

I recommend implementing that logic in your app:

  • Detect the jump and keep track of it.
  • When you want to scroll, check the state of the app to see where it jumped.
  • Then set ImageIdIndex before you scroll from that location and then scroll.

Does this make sense?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants