Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove chunk store parallelisation; add backoff #119

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 7, 2016

Conversation

tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor

We're battling with overloading dynamoDB, so anything that makes it easier to understand...

@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will need post merge review #97

@tomwilkie tomwilkie merged commit 624b1f2 into master Nov 7, 2016
@tomwilkie tomwilkie deleted the remove-put-parallelisation branch November 7, 2016 22:21
@tomwilkie tomwilkie changed the title Remove chunk store parallelisation; I want this controlled by the ingester Remove chunk store parallelisation; add backoff Nov 7, 2016
@tomwilkie tomwilkie mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2016
30 tasks
@jml jml mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2016
if err := i.flushChunks(ctx, op.fp, series.metric, chunks); err != nil {
err := i.flushChunks(ctx, op.fp, series.metric, chunks)
if err != nil {
if awsErr, ok := err.(awserr.Error); ok && awsErr.Code() == provisionedThroughputExceededException {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instrumenting here would help fix https://github.com/weaveworks/monitoring/issues/12.

(No change required, immediately. One of us will get to it soon enough.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes! Instrumentation would be good for this. Will do it now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants