Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Application writers' guide #5826

Closed
mossid opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 6 comments · Fixed by #6464
Closed

Application writers' guide #5826

mossid opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 6 comments · Fixed by #6464
Assignees
Labels
T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation.

Comments

@mossid
Copy link
Contributor

mossid commented Sep 19, 2019

Applications on IBC have to be run independently of the machine architectures. A guide(or a checklist) for application writers will be beneficial to check whether their application is truely IBC compatible or not.

The guide will contain the corresponding elements between different chain architectures, so the writers can assign them into the application to check the universality.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Oct 17, 2019

This is a subset of cosmos/ibc#260, but we can track it separately.

Do you want to write this @mossid, or do you want me to write it? Either is fine with me.

@cwgoes cwgoes transferred this issue from cosmos/ibc Mar 18, 2020
@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Mar 18, 2020

This documentation should live in the SDK, not the spec repository.

@cwgoes cwgoes removed their assignment Mar 18, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes added this to the IBC 1.0 milestone Mar 18, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes added T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation. x/ibc labels Mar 18, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes modified the milestones: IBC 1.0, IBC GoZ Readiness Apr 7, 2020
@jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

It would be really nice to be able to have this be a tutorial driven through the scaffold. That way users could come out with their own blockchain with a custom protocol!

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Apr 21, 2020

@marbar3778 Are you interested in this, potentially?

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

I can take this on, but not for a bit, trying to move the Tendermint Protobuf work forward.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Apr 22, 2020

I can take this on, but not for a bit, trying to move the Tendermint Protobuf work forward.

Aye, thanks, not urgent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants