Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C.1.X sublineage associated with Southern Africa #139

Closed
grovesn opened this issue Jul 9, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

C.1.X sublineage associated with Southern Africa #139

grovesn opened this issue Jul 9, 2021 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@grovesn
Copy link

grovesn commented Jul 9, 2021

C.1.X sublineage associated with Southern Africa

by Natalie Groves

Description

Sub-lineage of: C.1
Earliest sequence: 2021-05-11
Most recent sequence: 2021-06-27
Countries circulating: South Africa (7), UK (2)

Small clade of sequences within lineage C.1 that have a distinct spike profile. Most sequences are from South Africa but sequences have also been observed in travellers in the UK.

Mutations observed:

Gene Mutations
orf1ab E102K,T1246I,T1637I,L3201P,G3278S,3675-3677del,P4715L
S P9L,P25L,C136F,144del,R190S,D215G,243-244del,Y449H,E484K,N501Y,D614G,H655Y,N679K,T716I,T859N
orf3a 255del
M I82T
N P13L,R203K,G204R,Q384H

Genomes

clade_sequences.csv

Evidence

Tree shows all GISAID C.1 sequences and clade described highlighted in yellow.

c 1_investigation aligned tree

@rambaut rambaut added proposed Proposal for a new lineage urgent Proposal flagged for urgent review (provide explanation) labels Jul 21, 2021
@rambaut
Copy link
Contributor

rambaut commented Jul 21, 2021

There are now more genomes of this from various countries - probably needs designating.

@insapathogenomics
Copy link

insapathogenomics commented Jul 21, 2021

We have also recently detected one sequence with this profile in Portugal with the additional Spike mutation N440K (EPI_ISL_2989113).

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link
Member

These sequences seem to cluster with @grovesn and @insapathogenomics sequences:

Shenzhen/IVDC-0610-33/2021      EPI_ISL_2931281 2021-06-15
SouthAfrica/NICD-N10213/2021    EPI_ISL_2984801 2021-07-02
SouthAfrica/NICD-N10228/2021    EPI_ISL_2988404 2021-06-29
SouthAfrica/NICD-N10245/2021    EPI_ISL_2988878 2021-06-29
SouthAfrica/NICD-N10255/2021    EPI_ISL_2988405 2021-06-26
SouthAfrica/NICD-N10596/2021    EPI_ISL_2988409 2021-06-30
SouthAfrica/NICD-N9826/2021     EPI_ISL_2942287 2021-06-15
SouthAfrica/VIDA-KRISP-K018954/2021   EPI_ISL_2841668   2021-06-24
SouthAfrica/VIDA-KRISP-K018963/2021   EPI_ISL_2841677   2021-06-21
Switzerland/VD-CHUV-GEN5512/2021      EPI_ISL_2868597   2021-06

They are kind of messy though, lots of mutations that appear together (or not) inconsistently, so I also wonder how much contamination is muddling the waters here.

Here's a Nextstrain view of all 20 sequences with the most closely related outgroup sequence, from a modified version of the 2021-07-20 UCSC tree (a weird probably-contaminated branch in the UCSC tree attracted the sequences, so I removed that branch and added back these 20 to get this view):
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/hgwdev.gi.ucsc.edu/~angie/pango-designation-139_2021_07_20_lopped.json?branchLabel=Spike%20mutations&c=pango_lineage&label=nuc%20mutations:C2485T,G2659A,C5175T,A7699G,T9867C,A14431C,T28516C

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link
Member

chrisruis pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2021
@chrisruis
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @grovesn. We've added this as C.1.2 in v1.2.40 with 15 sequence designations (we didn't designate South_Africa/NICD-N10245/2021, South_Africa/NICD-N8122/2021, South_Africa/NICD-N8127/2021, South_Africa/NICD-N8104/2021 and South_Africa/VIDA-KRISP-K018963/2021 as they have >5% ambiguity)

@chrisruis chrisruis added this to the C.1.2 milestone Jul 22, 2021
@chrisruis chrisruis added designated and removed proposed Proposal for a new lineage urgent Proposal flagged for urgent review (provide explanation) labels Jul 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants