You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks very much for submitting this. To be designated as a Pango lineage, a clade needs to be associated with an epidemiological event, such as an introduction into a new country, and exhibit onward transmission within that new region. We've recently run through the B.1.177 tree and identified 87 B.1.177 sublineages that currently meet the requirements, outlined here. Where there's lots of mixing between countries without clear evidence of onward transmission within a country, the sequences retain the parental lineage. I've run the sequences you submitted through the new pangolin that contains the B.1.177 sublineages and the sequences are mostly assigned to B.1.177 and B.1.177.11 under the new lineage classifications. This is the pangolin output: lineage_report.txt. Under the Pango rules, I don't think there's a justification for a new B.1.177 sublineage in this case but these sequences fall into multiple current lineages. Thanks again for you submission
New Linage proposal: B.1.177.637
Suggested by: Paula Ruiz-Rodriguez and Mireia Coscolla
Description:
Sublineage of: B.1.177
Proposed name: B.1.177.637
Earliest sequence: 2020-06-29
Latest sequence: 2021-02-06
Countries circulating: United Kingdom, Spain, France, Italy, Gibraltar, Denmark, Ireland, Norway, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Belgium, Portugal, Poland, Canada, China, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Czech Republic, Austria, Luxembourg, Germany, Netherlands.
Genomes:
B.1.177.637.txt
Mutations of B.1.177.637:
Evidence:
PDF with B.1.177.637 phylogeny: B.177.637.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: