Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Linage proposal: B.1.177.637 #22

Closed
PathoGenOmics opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

New Linage proposal: B.1.177.637 #22

PathoGenOmics opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
not accepted A proposal for a new lineage has not been accepted

Comments

@PathoGenOmics
Copy link

New Linage proposal: B.1.177.637

Suggested by: Paula Ruiz-Rodriguez and Mireia Coscolla

Description:

Sublineage of: B.1.177
Proposed name: B.1.177.637
Earliest sequence: 2020-06-29
Latest sequence: 2021-02-06
Countries circulating: United Kingdom, Spain, France, Italy, Gibraltar, Denmark, Ireland, Norway, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Belgium, Portugal, Poland, Canada, China, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Czech Republic, Austria, Luxembourg, Germany, Netherlands.

Genomes:

B.1.177.637.txt

Mutations of B.1.177.637:

Nucleotide position Reference Mutation Type of mutation Protein Amino acid replacement
445 T C synonymous_variant ORF1ab V60V
3037 C T synonymous_variant ORF1ab F924F
6286 C T synonymous_variant ORF1ab T2007T
14408 C T missense_variant ORF1ab P4715L
21255 G C synonymous_variant ORF1ab A6997A
22227 C T missense_variant S A222V
23403 A G missense_variant S D614G
25049 G T missense_variant S D1163Y
25062 G T missense_variant S G1167V
26801 C G synonymous_variant M L93L
28657 C T synonymous_variant N D128D
28932 C T missense_variant N A220V
29366 C T missense_variant N P365S
29645 G T missense_variant ORF10 V30L

Evidence:

B 1 177_and_B 1 177 637_phylo

PDF with B.1.177.637 phylogeny: B.177.637.pdf

@PathoGenOmics
Copy link
Author

One of the major characteristics that characterize this possible lineage is the co-occurrence of D1163Y and G1167V (In the S protein) which is only found in this clade.
The publication associated with mentioned lineage: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.08.21253075v1
Twitter thread explaining it: https://twitter.com/gen_uv/status/1370384465076322305?s=20

@chrisruis
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks very much for submitting this. To be designated as a Pango lineage, a clade needs to be associated with an epidemiological event, such as an introduction into a new country, and exhibit onward transmission within that new region. We've recently run through the B.1.177 tree and identified 87 B.1.177 sublineages that currently meet the requirements, outlined here. Where there's lots of mixing between countries without clear evidence of onward transmission within a country, the sequences retain the parental lineage. I've run the sequences you submitted through the new pangolin that contains the B.1.177 sublineages and the sequences are mostly assigned to B.1.177 and B.1.177.11 under the new lineage classifications. This is the pangolin output:
lineage_report.txt. Under the Pango rules, I don't think there's a justification for a new B.1.177 sublineage in this case but these sequences fall into multiple current lineages. Thanks again for you submission

@chrisruis chrisruis added the not accepted A proposal for a new lineage has not been accepted label Apr 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
not accepted A proposal for a new lineage has not been accepted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants