Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brazilian XBB.1.18.1 lineage with mutations S:F456L and NSP3:S1007N #2225

Open
larboh-ioc opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@larboh-ioc
Copy link

By Rede Genômica Fiocruz

Description:

We found a highly supported (aLRT = 93) clade within lineage XBB.1.18.1 (n = 83) harboring mutations S:F456L and NSP3:S1007N, mostly from Brazil (n = 77, 93%).

This clade branch independently of lineage FE.1 that also evolved from the XBB.1.18.1 precursor by acquiring the mutation S:F456L.

Defining mutations: S:F456L and NSP3:S1007N
Gisaid query: S:F456L and NSP3:S1007N

Earliest sequence: EPI_ISL_17560653, Brazil 2023-02-13
Latest sequence: EPI_ISL_18044728, Brazil 2023-07-16

Lineage Collection:

EPI_SET ID: EPI_SET_230828nd
doi: 10.55876/gis8.230828nd

Tree:

hcov_19_xbb_n1544_phylo_MCCT tree

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

FedeGueli commented Aug 28, 2023

Thank you this was proposed alreay one month ago here: sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals#500 bu i'll close mine to keep your one open , being you the scientists on the battlefield.

@corneliusroemer please take this one as reference.

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

cc @AngieHinrichs this is the same lineage we wondered about on the other repo about XBB.1.18.1 /Fe.1 placement. Now proposed directly by the brazilian scientists of Rede Genômica Fiocruz . So if any news on the tree please refer to this issue.

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link
Member

Thanks @FedeGueli. The problem of split/misplaced FE.1 from the other issue seems to have been fixed. 🤞

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @FedeGueli. The problem of split/misplaced FE.1 from the other issue seems to have been fixed. 🤞

Thank you Angie! Great work as usual.

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

Still 82 seqs it seems it slowed down a lot.

@DailyCovidCases
Copy link

This branch is dead, please close this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants