Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Two potential sublineages of B.1.621.1, one with Spike Y449N and E583D, the other with Spike S939F #232

Closed
c19850727 opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 11 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@c19850727
Copy link

c19850727 commented Oct 1, 2021

Proposed sublineage 1
Description
Sub-lineage of: B.1.621.1 (98 sequences)
Earliest sequence: 2021/5/15 (Spain)
Most recent sequence: 2021/9/11 (Chile)
Countries circulating: Chile (19 sequences); also found in Cadada, Colombia, Peru and the US, likely extinct though.
Mutations in addition to B.1.621.1:
M: R146H
N: T391I (defining)
S: Y449N, E583D
ORF1a: T812I
ORF7a: Q94H
Genomes:
MU Y449N.csv

Proposed sublineage 2
Description
Sub-lineage of: B.1.621.1 (264 sequences)
Earliest sequence: 2021/5/19 (Spain)
Most recent sequence: 2021/9/8 (the US-CA)
Countries circulating: the US, predominantly California (212 sequences), and other states (41 sequences)
Mutations in addition to B.1.621.1:
N: T379I (defining)
S: S939F (defining)
ORF1a: N2147D, K2148R (defining), T2952I
ORF3a: V259L
Genomes:
MU S939F.csv

Evidence:
image
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-euro.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_euro_9c64_648aa0.json?c=gt-nuc_26959,24378&l=radial

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

As cited in #299 there is an interesting thread on twitter on sublineage 1 by Ricardo Rivero @RicardoRH96
https://twitter.com/Ricardo__JRH/status/1450544232750620675?s=20

@MCB6
Copy link

MCB6 commented Nov 2, 2021

A new GISAID upload just came from Colombia. It continues to look like the issue in #299 is real, and S:E583D+S:Y449N continues to expand even as the rest of Mu is close to extinction
Mu-Colombia

@RicardoRH96
Copy link

A new GISAID upload just came from Colombia. It continues to look like the issue in #299 is real, and S:E583D+S:Y449N continues to expand even as the rest of Mu is close to extinction Mu-Colombia

It is necessary to keep an eye on this lineage, hope it gets designated soon.

@corneliusroemer
Copy link
Contributor

It looks interesting, yes, because it seems to be able to almost compete with Delta - but only in Colombia, not Chile.

Colombia doesn't sequence much so the uncertainty is huge. But it does seem to have staying powers which is very interesting.

image

covSpectrum
I support designation @chrisruis

@MCB6
Copy link

MCB6 commented Nov 2, 2021

Colombia doesn't sequence much so the uncertainty is huge.

That's why I got excited today when they nearly doubled the number of last two month's sequences. I don't think it's visible at covSpectrum yet. But still with the grand total of 5 sequences in October, it's too uncertain, and regional variation may obscure any real trends. In Chile it see to be highly regional too, like Atacama in the North?

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

@MCB6
Copy link

MCB6 commented Nov 3, 2021

@MCB6 you could search on CovSpectrum just the mutations.

https://cov-spectrum.ethz.ch/explore/South%20America/AllSamples/Past3M/variants?aaMutations=S%3A449N%2CS%3A583D

And one can click on Chile's regions to realize that at one point, this Mu variety accounted for almost all of Atacama's sequences. But apparently not anymore. The strain dynamics in this region has several weirdly quick sweeps. Before mid-August it was Chile's usual Gamma / Lambda mix. Then Mu arrived and in just one months achieved total dominance (mostly, but not only, this substrain). Then Delta arrived and in another month the sweep was complete, with the classic Mu going away first, and the Mu+S:449N+S583D holding for only a little bit longer.
The number of cases in Atacama has been quite low during all this era of sweeps, mostly in single digits daily, so we may be dealing with founder outbreaks rather than with true strain competition? Which might explain the unrealistically fast changes?
Mu-Atacama
Mu-Atacama1

@MCB6
Copy link

MCB6 commented Nov 14, 2021

Mu+S:449N+S583D was also in Lima, Peru in early August, seems to have disappeared by mid-September. 10 samples from Peru (they only started extensive sequencing in recent weeks, added over 3,000 genomes so far).

Colombia added more October samples today. Mu+S:449N+S583D still accounts for ~10% of the recently collected samples (8 / 85 samples)

@InfrPopGen InfrPopGen self-assigned this Nov 21, 2021
@MCB6
Copy link

MCB6 commented Nov 21, 2021

Another batch from Colombia uploaded, including some late-October samples. The slight expansion trend of Mu+Spike_E583D,Spike_Y449N is holding well. In contrast, other varieties of Mu are nearly extinct.
image

@InfrPopGen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for submitting. We've added proposal 1 as lineage BB.1 with 91 designated sequences in v1.2.113
and proposal 2 as lineage BB.2 with 238 designated sequences in v1.2.113

chrisruis added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2021
New lineage designations BB.1 and BB.2 as per #232
@chrisruis chrisruis added this to the BB.1 BB.2 milestone Dec 17, 2021
@chrisruis
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like BB.1 clusters outside of B.1.621.1 in recent UShER trees. It still clusters within B.1.621 so we've updated BB.1 to B.1.621.2 and withdrawn BB.1 in v1.2.122

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants