Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC-458 FieldTable documentation revision #356

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2017
Merged

DOC-458 FieldTable documentation revision #356

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2017

Conversation

fbeaudoincoveo
Copy link
Contributor

Deploy

@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ export interface IBadgeOptions extends IFieldValueOptions {
colors: IBadgeColors;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the IBadgeColors / IBadgeColor is used to specify the colors options as well as in the parseColors, getColor(), and renderOneValue() public methods, do you think it would be a good idea to expose these interfaces in the public doc?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

*/
separator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ defaultValue: ';' }),
separator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ depend: 'splitValues', defaultValue: ';' }),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made this depend of splitValues being true because it seems to make sense. Please make sure this is correct.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

*/
displaySeparator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ defaultValue: ', ' }),
displaySeparator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ depend: 'splitValues', defaultValue: ', ' }),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See previous comment.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

* Specifies whether the table is minimized by default.
* If {@link FieldTable.options.allowMinimization} is `true`, specifies whether to minimize the table by default.
*
* Default value is `undefined`, and the FieldTable will collapse by default if the result it is associated with has
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please make sure this information is correct :)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.185% when pulling 5607bf6 on fbeaudoincoveo:FieldTableDocRevision into c67b6ba on coveo:master.

@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ export interface IBadgeOptions extends IFieldValueOptions {
colors: IBadgeColors;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

*/
separator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ defaultValue: ';' }),
separator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ depend: 'splitValues', defaultValue: ';' }),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

*/
displaySeparator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ defaultValue: ', ' }),
displaySeparator: ComponentOptions.buildStringOption({ depend: 'splitValues', defaultValue: ', ' }),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@olamothe olamothe merged commit ef747f6 into coveo:master Feb 15, 2017
@fbeaudoincoveo fbeaudoincoveo deleted the FieldTableDocRevision branch February 16, 2017 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants