We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There are a few issues w. the current implementation of CARPDataPoint:
CARPDataPoint
study_id
study_deployment_id
header
body
carp_header
carp_body
trigger_id
device_role_name
In general -- there is a need for better alignment of CARP core with CAMS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Released as part of CAMS v. 0.20.0.
Sorry, something went wrong.
bardram
No branches or pull requests
There are a few issues w. the current implementation of
CARPDataPoint
:study_id
should bestudy_deployment_id
according to v. 1.2header
andbody
fields in the batch file should becarp_header
andcarp_body
trigger_id
should be set correctlydevice_role_name
should be set correctlyIn general -- there is a need for better alignment of CARP core with CAMS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: