Drop Bazel Support

[cpisciotta]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5df94fd) 85.83% compared to head (ccfeb2c) 85.83%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #182   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.83%   85.83%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1842     1842           
=======================================
  Hits         1581     1581           
  Misses        261      261           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sanju-naik]

@cpisciotta Any reason we are dropping Bazel support? We use this library to format our Bazel build output logs.

And also from the code changes it looks like We are dropping support for building this library with Bazel, but formatting bazel build logs using this library is still supported? Is my understanding correct?

[cpisciotta]

@sanju-naik This PR drops support for building the xcbeautify project itself with Bazel. I don't use the Bazel build system, so I dropped support for it since I'm not maintaining it. As I understand it, this change breaks support for projects using xcbeautify (namely XcbeautifyLib) as an out-of-the-box Bazel dependency. Importantly, I do not intend to drop formatting support for output generated by a Bazel project.