Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[class.virtual] Remove awkward 'but'. #1182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2016
Merged

[class.virtual] Remove awkward 'but'. #1182

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion source/derived.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -800,7 +800,7 @@
\pnum
\indextext{definition!virtual~function}%
A virtual function declared in a class shall be defined, or declared
pure~(\ref{class.abstract}) in that class, or both; but no diagnostic is
pure~(\ref{class.abstract}) in that class, or both; no diagnostic is
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you declare a function "abstract"? I thought functions are "pure" and classes are abstract.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The "pure" thing is explained a bit more in [class.abstract]. Nothing in the normative text suggests a function can be abstract.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind, I misread that, "abstract" only appears in the label, not in the text.

required~(\ref{basic.def.odr}).
\indextext{friend!\tcode{virtual}~and}%

Expand Down