-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2011 A pipeline-rewrite operator #748
Comments
See #304 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Poll: Enourage further work on a pipeline rewrite operator?
Consensus Poll: We like Unanimous Poll: Explore giving the operator a lower precedence than dot/arrow (and other grammar tweaks)?
Consensus Poll: Explore currying support?
Consensus against Next steps for paper: revise, come back to EWG-I |
P2011R1 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike) |
Seen at the EWG telecon yesterday. Polls: We're generally interested in some pipepline operator, assuming my preferred placeholder syntax and precedence is chosen?
Pipeline operator should have a placeholder, with design to be determined.
Pipeline operator should not have a placeholder.
|
P2011R0 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: