P2011 A pipeline-rewrite operator

[wg21bot]

P2011R0 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike)

[jfbastien]

See #304

[brevzin]

@jfbastien These papers have nothing to do with each other, outside of choosing the same token.

[theres-waldo]

EWG-I in Prague

Poll: Enourage further work on a pipeline rewrite operator?

SF	F	N	A	SA
12	4	1	0	0

Consensus

Poll: We like |> as the operator spelling?

Unanimous

Poll: Explore giving the operator a lower precedence than dot/arrow (and other grammar tweaks)?

SF	F	N	A	SA
11	7	0	0	0

Consensus

Poll: Explore currying support?

SF	F	N	A	SA
1	1	3	8	2

Consensus against

Next steps for paper: revise, come back to EWG-I

[wg21bot]

P2011R1 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike)

[jfbastien]

Seen at the EWG telecon yesterday. Polls:

We're generally interested in some pipepline operator, assuming my preferred placeholder syntax and precedence is chosen?

SF	F	N	A	SA
11	8	3	2	0

Pipeline operator should have a placeholder, with design to be determined.

SF	F	N	A	SA
6	12	4	1	1

Pipeline operator should not have a placeholder.

SF	F	N	A	SA
1	3	10	6	2