Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2011 A pipeline-rewrite operator #748

Open
wg21bot opened this issue Jan 18, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

P2011 A pipeline-rewrite operator #748

wg21bot opened this issue Jan 18, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@wg21bot wg21bot commented Jan 18, 2020

P2011R0 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike)

@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWG label Jan 18, 2020
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2020-02 milestone Jan 18, 2020
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfbastien jfbastien commented Jan 22, 2020

See #304

@jfbastien jfbastien added EWGI and removed EWG labels Jan 22, 2020
@BRevzin

This comment has been hidden.

@theres-waldo theres-waldo added this to Tuesday AM in EWG-I Prague Feb 7, 2020
@theres-waldo
Copy link
Collaborator

@theres-waldo theres-waldo commented Feb 11, 2020

EWG-I in Prague

Poll: Enourage further work on a pipeline rewrite operator?

SF F N A SA
12 4 1 0 0

Consensus

Poll: We like |> as the operator spelling?

Unanimous

Poll: Explore giving the operator a lower precedence than dot/arrow (and other grammar tweaks)?

SF F N A SA
11 7 0 0 0

Consensus

Poll: Explore currying support?

SF F N A SA
1 1 3 8 2

Consensus against

Next steps for paper: revise, come back to EWG-I

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2020-02 milestone Feb 18, 2020
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wg21bot wg21bot commented Apr 24, 2020

P2011R1 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike)

@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2020-telecon milestone Apr 24, 2020
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfbastien jfbastien commented Sep 11, 2020

Seen at the EWG telecon yesterday. Polls:

We're generally interested in some pipepline operator, assuming my preferred placeholder syntax and precedence is chosen?

SF F N A SA
11 8 3 2 0

Pipeline operator should have a placeholder, with design to be determined.

SF F N A SA
6 12 4 1 1

Pipeline operator should not have a placeholder.

SF F N A SA
1 3 10 6 2
@jfbastien jfbastien added EWG and removed EWGI labels Sep 21, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2020-telecon milestone Dec 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
EWG-I Prague
Tuesday AM
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
5 participants