P2011 A pipeline-rewrite operator #748
Open
Labels
Projects
Comments
See #304 |
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
Poll: Enourage further work on a pipeline rewrite operator?
Consensus Poll: We like Unanimous Poll: Explore giving the operator a lower precedence than dot/arrow (and other grammar tweaks)?
Consensus Poll: Explore currying support?
Consensus against Next steps for paper: revise, come back to EWG-I |
P2011R1 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike) |
Seen at the EWG telecon yesterday. Polls: We're generally interested in some pipepline operator, assuming my preferred placeholder syntax and precedence is chosen?
Pipeline operator should have a placeholder, with design to be determined.
Pipeline operator should not have a placeholder.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
P2011R0 A pipeline-rewrite operator (Barry Revzin, Colby Pike)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: