(#472) - Remove checkstyle suppression

[victornoel]

This is for #472.

The changes are small, but I verified that:

• all the tests were present
• there was no more things to extract from the class
• that it didn't make sense to transform the build method into a class because we would end up with two classes, one for XmlGraph just delegating to the second, and the second very similar to XmlGraph as it is currently written.

It also gave me the opportunity to understand what the code was doing, and I opened a few issues in cactoos and jpeek.

[victornoel]

@paulodamaso 0rat seems to have missed this PR, can you tell him to take it into scope? Thx :)

[paulodamaso]

@0crat in

[0crat]

This pull request #476 is assigned to @vzurauskas/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[vzurauskas]

@paulodamaso The points listed in the PR description make sense, nothing to comment. Can be merged.

[paulodamaso]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 10min)

[vzurauskas]

@0crat status

[0crat]

@0crat status (here)

@vzurauskas This is what I know about this job in C7JGJ00DP, as in §32:

• The job #476 is in scope for 3days
• The role is REV
• The job is assigned to @vzurauskas/z for 3days
• There is a monetary reward attached
• @vzurauskas/z will get 25% of their hourly rate for this job
• The job doesn't have any impediments
• The budget is 15 minutes/points
• These users are banned and won't be assigned:
  • @victornoel/z: This user reported the ticket
• Job footprint (restricted area)

[vzurauskas]

@paulodamaso I think this should be assigned to QA now?

[paulodamaso]

@0crat out

[0crat]

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @vzurauskas/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[sereshqua]

@0crat quality bad

[0crat]

Quality is low, no payment, see §31