Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
0 parents
commit 17e6463
Showing
5 changed files
with
232 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | ||
Package: CREDS | ||
Type: Package | ||
Title: Calibrated Ratio Estimator under Double Sampling Design | ||
Version: 0.1.0 | ||
Authors@R: c(person("Dr. Sadikul", "Islam", role = c("aut","cre"), email = "sadikul.islamiasri@gmail.com"),person("Dr. Md", "Yeasin", role = "aut", email = "yeasin.iasri@gmail.com"),person("Dr. M.", "Muruganandam", role = "aut", email = "mail2mmm20@gmail.com"), person("Dr. M.", "Madhu ", role = "aut", email = "madhupmd@gmail.com")) | ||
Author: Dr. Sadikul Islam [aut, cre], | ||
Dr. Md Yeasin [aut], | ||
Dr. M. Muruganandam [aut], | ||
Dr. M. Madhu [aut] | ||
Maintainer: Dr. Sadikul Islam <sadikul.islamiasri@gmail.com> | ||
Description: Population ratio estimator (calibrated) under two-phase random sampling design has gained enormous popularity in the recent time. This package provides functions for estimation population ratio (calibrated) under two phase sampling design, including the approximate variance of the ratio estimator. The improved ratio estimator can be applicable for both the case, when auxiliary data is available at unit level or aggregate level (eg., mean or total) for first phase sampled. Calibration weight of each unit of the second phase sample was calculated. Single and combined inclusion probabilities were also estimated for both phases under two phase random [simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR)] sampling. The improved ratio estimator's percentage coefficient of variation was also determined as a measure of accuracy. This package has been developed based on the theoretical development of Islam et al. (2021) and Ozgul (2020) <doi:10.1080/00949655.2020.1844702>. | ||
License: GPL-3 | ||
Encoding: UTF-8 | ||
RoxygenNote: 7.2.0 | ||
Imports: MASS, stats | ||
NeedsCompilation: no | ||
Packaged: 2022-06-29 17:03:45 UTC; YEASIN | ||
Repository: CRAN | ||
Date/Publication: 2022-07-01 10:50:01 UTC |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
59ed3ff9576abcc1c38e5b101ec3f98e *DESCRIPTION | ||
a8e963393566ceb0468de2e0830cd5cd *NAMESPACE | ||
d282e50670ad073e39f8f51f4af4b9ae *R/CREDS.R | ||
983b38212247d52ac8b929bd4d6fab3c *man/RCRatio.Rd |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
# Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand | ||
|
||
export(RCRatio) | ||
import(MASS) | ||
import(stats) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ | ||
#'@title Calibrated Ratio Estimator under Double Sampling Design | ||
#' @description Population ratio estimator under two-phase random sampling design has gained enormous popularity in present era. This package provides functions for estimation calibrated population ratio under two phase sampling design, including the approximate variance of the ratio estimator. The improved ratio estimator can be applicable for both the case, when auxiliary data is available at unit level or aggregate level for first phase sampled. Calibration weight of each unit of the second phase sample was calculated. Single and combined inclusion probabilities were also estimated for both phases under two phase random sampling. The improved ratio estimator's percentage coefficient of variation was also determined as a measure of accuracy. | ||
#' @param N Population size | ||
#' @param FSU First stage sampling units | ||
#' @param SSU Second stage sampling units | ||
#' @import MASS stats | ||
#' | ||
#' @return | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#' \item CalEstimate: Estimate value of calibration estimator | ||
#' \item CalVariance: Variance of calibration estimator | ||
#' \item CV: Coefficient of variance | ||
#' \item SampleSize: Sample Size of FSU and SSU | ||
#' \item DesignWeight: Design weight vector | ||
#' \item InclusionProb: Inclusion probability vector | ||
#' \item Correlation: Correlation value | ||
#' } | ||
#' | ||
#' @export | ||
#' | ||
#' @examples | ||
#' f1<-rnorm(100,20,5) | ||
#' f2<-rnorm(100,20,5) | ||
#' fsu<-cbind(f1,f2) | ||
#' s1<-rnorm(50,20,5) | ||
#' s2<-rnorm(50,20,5) | ||
#' s3<-rnorm(50,20,5) | ||
#' s4<-rnorm(50,20,5) | ||
#' ssu<-cbind(s1,s2,s3,s4) | ||
#' RCRatio(N=1000, FSU=fsu, SSU=ssu) | ||
#' | ||
#' @references | ||
#' \itemize{ | ||
#'\item Islam, S., Chandra, H., Sud, U.C., Basak, P., Ghosh, N. and Ojasvi, P.R. (2021). A Revised Calibration Weight based Ratio Estimator in Two-phase Sampling: A Case when Unit Level Auxiliary Information is Available for the First-phase Sample, Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 75(2), 147–156. | ||
#'\item Ozgul, N. (2021). New improved calibration estimator based on two auxiliary variables in stratified two-phase sampling. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 91(6), 1243-1256. | ||
#' } | ||
|
||
RCRatio<-function(N,FSU,SSU ){ | ||
fsu<-as.data.frame(FSU) | ||
ssu<-as.data.frame(SSU) | ||
n1=dim(fsu)[1] # first phase sample size | ||
n2=dim(ssu)[1] # second phase sample size | ||
d2i<-n1/n2; di<-N/n2 | ||
d1i=N/n1;#di=n1/n2;d1i;di | ||
|
||
pi_1i=1/d1i #First phase inclusion probability | ||
|
||
pi_1ij=(n1*(n1-1))/(N*(N-1)) #joined inclusion probability | ||
pi_2ij=(n2*(n2-1))/(n1*(n1-1)) | ||
|
||
pi=1/di #overall inclusion probability | ||
|
||
|
||
x1_fsu<-fsu[,1] | ||
x2_fsu<-fsu[,2] | ||
|
||
y_ssu<-ssu[,1] | ||
z_ssu<-ssu[,3] | ||
|
||
x1_ssu<-ssu[,2] | ||
x2_ssu<-ssu[,4] | ||
|
||
#Pearson's correlation coefficient | ||
|
||
Rho_yz<-cor(y_ssu,z_ssu) | ||
Rho_yx1<-cor(y_ssu,x1_ssu) | ||
Rho_yx2<-cor(y_ssu,x2_ssu) | ||
Rho_zx1<-cor(z_ssu,x1_ssu) | ||
Rho_zx2<-cor(z_ssu,x2_ssu) | ||
cor<-cbind(yz=Rho_yz,yx1=Rho_yx1,yx2=Rho_yx2,zx1=Rho_zx1,zx2=Rho_zx2) | ||
|
||
t.xs1<-as.matrix(apply(fsu,2,sum)) | ||
|
||
t.xs2<-as.matrix(apply(ssu[,c(1,4)],2,sum)) | ||
|
||
# Direct ratio estimator | ||
Est_R<- sum(y_ssu)/sum(z_ssu) #Simple est_R | ||
|
||
A_prime=d1i*t.xs1[1] | ||
B_prime=d1i*t.xs1[2] | ||
|
||
sum_da=di*t.xs2[1] | ||
sum_db=di*t.xs2[2] | ||
|
||
a=x1_ssu | ||
b=x2_ssu | ||
|
||
sum_daa=di*(t(a)%*%a) | ||
sum_dbb=di*(t(b)%*%b) | ||
sum_dab=di*(t(a)%*%b) | ||
#calibration weight | ||
|
||
w_cap1<- rep(0,n2) | ||
for (i in 1:n2){ | ||
c1=((di*a[i])*(sum_dbb*(A_prime-sum_da)-sum_dab*(B_prime-sum_db))) | ||
c2=(sum_daa*sum_dbb-sum_dab*sum_dab) | ||
c3=((di*b[i])*(sum_daa*(B_prime-sum_db)-sum_dab*(A_prime-sum_da))) | ||
w_cap1[i]=di+c1/c2+c3/c2 | ||
|
||
} | ||
#proposed calibration estimator | ||
R_cap2<- (t(w_cap1)%*%y_ssu)/(t(w_cap1)%*%z_ssu) | ||
|
||
#Variance of proposed calibration estimator | ||
sum_daa=di*(t(a)%*%a) | ||
sum_dbb=di*(t(b)%*%b) | ||
sum_dab=di*(t(a)%*%b) | ||
|
||
sum_dyy=di*(t(y_ssu)%*%y_ssu) | ||
sum_dzz=di*(t(z_ssu)%*%z_ssu) | ||
sum_dya=di*(t(y_ssu)%*%a) | ||
sum_dyb=di*(t(y_ssu)%*%b) | ||
sum_dza=di*(t(z_ssu)%*%a) | ||
sum_dzb=di*(t(z_ssu)%*%b) | ||
|
||
t_cap_z<-di*(t(z_ssu)%*%z_ssu) | ||
|
||
c11<-N*(N-n1)/(n1*t_cap_z^2) | ||
c22<-N^2*(n1-n2)/(n1*n2*t_cap_z^2) | ||
|
||
R_cap<-Est_R | ||
u_cap<-y_ssu-R_cap*z_ssu | ||
q<-sum_daa*sum_dbb-sum_dab^2 | ||
|
||
l1<-(sum_dyb*sum_dyy-sum_dya*sum_dab)/q | ||
l2<-(sum_dya*sum_dbb-sum_dyb*sum_dab)/q | ||
l3<-(sum_dzb*sum_daa-sum_dza*sum_dab)/q | ||
l4<-(sum_dza*sum_dbb-sum_dzb*sum_dab)/q | ||
|
||
v_cap=u_cap+b%*%(l3*R_cap-l1)+a%*%(l4*R_cap-l2) | ||
|
||
v_cap_mean=mean(v_cap) | ||
vec_1=c(rep(1,n2)) | ||
|
||
|
||
SS_v=(1/(n2-1))*(vec_1%*%(v_cap-vec_1*v_cap_mean)^2) | ||
|
||
y_cap_mean=mean(y_ssu) | ||
z_cap_mean=mean(z_ssu) | ||
|
||
SS_y=(1/(n2-1))*(vec_1%*%(y_ssu-vec_1*y_cap_mean)^2) | ||
SS_z=(1/(n2-1))*(vec_1%*%(z_ssu-vec_1*z_cap_mean)^2) | ||
Rho_yz<-cor(y_ssu,z_ssu) | ||
|
||
SS_u=SS_y+R_cap^2*SS_z-2*R_cap*Rho_yz*sqrt(SS_y)*sqrt(SS_z) | ||
|
||
Var_RC2_SRS<-c11*SS_u+c22*SS_v | ||
|
||
CV=(sqrt(Var_RC2_SRS)/R_cap2)*100 | ||
samplesize<-cbind(FS=n1,SS=n2) | ||
designweight<-cbind(FS=d1i, SS=d2i, Overall=di) | ||
incprob<-cbind(pi_1i,pi_1ij,pi_2ij,pi_2ij) | ||
cor<-cbind(yz=Rho_yz,yx1=Rho_yx1,yx2=Rho_yx2,zx1=Rho_zx1,zx2=Rho_zx2) | ||
out<-list(CalEstimate=R_cap2,CalVariance=Var_RC2_SRS,CV=CV,SampleSize=samplesize, DesignWeight=designweight, InclusionProb=incprob,Correlation=cor ) | ||
|
||
return(out) | ||
} |
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.