-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade to JDK 1.8 #126
Upgrade to JDK 1.8 #126
Conversation
For some reason the TravisCI config is not being picked up. |
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ | |||
language: java | |||
|
|||
script: | |||
- jdk_switcher use oraclejdk8 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you tried
jdk:
- oraclejdk8
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ | |||
language: java | |||
|
|||
script: | |||
- jdk_switcher use oraclejdk8 | |||
- mvn install javadoc:aggregate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's this one for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This defines the targets to run... we always wish to build the Javadoc target as this lets us know if the Javadoc is JDK8 compliant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, thanks. I assumed the javadoc was checked by Travis
@@ -74,13 +74,13 @@ public static EffectiveTldFinder getInstance() { | |||
return instance; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
public boolean initialize(InputStream effective_tld_data_stream) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are _ not allowed in Java8?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes... but they are flagged as warn's for the Javac. It is not Java convention.
Did you run |
Actually no I did not.. I will do that right now. |
@jnioche can you please review again at your earlier opportunity. Thank you. |
Merged, thanks @lewismc |
and changed presentation of issue number
This issue addresses #125