Link to dockerhub or the respective hub in notification mail

[logopk]

Hi,

would it be possible to add a link to the tag page of docker hub (maybe other repos too).

I don't know if the url can always be deferred from the info like "docker.io/library/mariadb:latest"
-> https://hub.docker.com/_/mariadb?tab=tags

Thanks!

Peter

[crazy-max]

Hi @logopk,

would it be possible to add a link to the tag page of docker hub (maybe other repos too).

Yes that's possible.

I don't know if the url can always be deferred from the info like "docker.io/library/mariadb:latest"
-> https://hub.docker.com/_/mariadb?tab=tags

I'm not aware of a discovery service on registries to retrieve this kind of info so I think we should rely on a static dictionary to handle this.

[crazy-max]

@logopk Links to hubs are available through release 4.0.0-beta.3 if you want to try out.

[logopk]

Hi,
would like to but the change in config is a bit of a problem.
I just transitioned to version 3 with multiple instances for my different docker hosts.
But 4 refuses to come up:

diun_1     | Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:51:46 CEST INF Starting Diun version=4.0.0-beta.3
diun_1     | Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:51:46 CEST FTL Cannot load configuration error="Key: 'Config.Providers' Error:Field validation for 'Providers' failed on the 'required' tag"

Do you have a default config to start with? docker-compose preferrably?
Thanks

[logopk]

OK, I transitioned to ENV-VARS and now it works. Let me wait for the first notification.

[crazy-max]

@logopk

OK, I transitioned to ENV-VARS and now it works.

Yes env vars is the way-to-go if you use a provider like docker, swarm or k8s ;)

Let me wait for the first notification.

👍

[logopk]

Apparently smth. missing:

[crazy-max]

@logopk I don't think so, the link is here:

What did you expect?

[logopk]

🤦🏼‍♂️ Perfect! That's what I was hoping for! Thanks.

I got confused from this:

It's an extra Link on the bottom...

[crazy-max]

@logopk Yeah indeed for Slack I cannot combine a link and code

[logopk]

I see one issue - but this is due to the new one-provider solution - the notification mail has always the same provider-name: docker (or file).

It used to have the unique provider name.

Would it be possible to add the unique source of the Mails?

[crazy-max]

@logopk docker and swarm providers are unique so it will stay as it is. But concerning the file provider we can for example set the filename as the provider in the notification. What do you think?

[logopk]

Hmm. I have separated my three remote docker providers into 3 containers. Now all send mails as "docker". Before they all had unique (host-)names.
Some images run on all hosts, some only on one of them. Maybe I will have to improve my memory...

[crazy-max]

@logopk Ok thanks for the tips. I think I will prepend the hostname to the provider.

[logopk]

That sounds like a good idea. Thanks.

[crazy-max]

Available through 4.0.0 release. See https://crazy-max.github.io/diun/changelog/#400-20200622.

[logopk]

@crazy-max: this works perfectly with #102
Thanks again.