Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refine wording for validation of credential status #118

Open
scouten-adobe opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #138
Open

Refine wording for validation of credential status #118

scouten-adobe opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #138
Assignees
Labels
pending-pr-review Resolved, pending PR review
Milestone

Comments

@scouten-adobe
Copy link
Contributor

Per §9.3.5, “Validation of credential status,” refine discussion of validation of credentials status.

Some guidance is already provided in the validation section which can be referenced here.

@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe added this to the 1.0 milestone May 30, 2024
@scouten-adobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pblument I'd like to discuss the following two questions raised in §9.3.5, “Validation of credential status,” with you and arrive at guidance:

  • What if the bad actor is in an ingredient and not the primary piece of content?
  • What is displayed to the end-user in both the primary content and ingredient scenarios?

scouten-adobe added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2024
@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe linked a pull request Jul 9, 2024 that will close this issue
@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe added the pending-pr-review Resolved, pending PR review label Jul 9, 2024
@scouten-adobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

I split off the ingredient question into a (hopefully) post-1.0 item in #137.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pending-pr-review Resolved, pending PR review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants