Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci-verify: Run get-scripts only on main branch #6514

Merged

Conversation

jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind ci

What this PR does / why we need it:

This change adjusts the get-script and get-script-with-verification jobs to only run for PRs where the target branch is main, so that release branches do not fail with the latest configuration.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Closes #6512

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

None

This change adjusts the get-script and get-script-with-verification jobs
to only run for PRs where the target branch is `main`, so that release
branches do not fail with the latest configuration.

Closes cri-o#6512

Signed-off-by: Jose Valdes <jvaldes@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Jan 10, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/ci Categorizes issue or PR as related to CI labels Jan 10, 2023
@jrvaldes jrvaldes marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2023 22:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 10, 2023
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-1.26

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jrvaldes: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.26 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.26

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6514 (faeaced) into main (7fbf54b) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6514      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.48%   42.49%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         128      128              
  Lines       14943    14943              
==========================================
+ Hits         6348     6350       +2     
+ Misses       7904     7903       -1     
+ Partials      691      690       -1     

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cri-o/cri-o-maintainers PTAL

Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jrvaldes, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jrvaldes: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/kata-jenkins faeaced link true /test kata-containers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs
/override ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration
/override ci/kata-jenkins

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2023

@haircommander: Overrode contexts on behalf of haircommander: ci/kata-jenkins, ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs, ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration

In response to this:

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs
/override ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration
/override ci/kata-jenkins

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm /override ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs /override ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration /override ci/kata-jenkins

Is there a known issue? I have mixed feelings overriding required jobs, it may be an indication that they may not be required at all 😸

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

haircommander commented Jan 11, 2023

kata test one: #6481
I have been lazy and not opened issues for the others. I will fix that

EDIT: #6523 #6522

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

FWIW: ci-rhel-integration and ci-e2e-conmonrs aren't required, but the bot is kind of treating them as such

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm /override ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs /override ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration /override ci/kata-jenkins

@haircommander looks like the bot did not liked the override for the following jobs. PTAL.

  • ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs
  • ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs
/override ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2023

@haircommander: Overrode contexts on behalf of haircommander: ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs, ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/ci-e2e-conmonrs
/override ci/prow/ci-rhel-integration

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jrvaldes: new pull request created: #6525

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.26

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/ci Categorizes issue or PR as related to CI lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

get-script and get-script-with-verification CI jobs fail in release branches
6 participants