Dependency update for podman 5

[kannon92]

What type of PR is this?

/kind dependency-change
/

What this PR does / why we need it:

Upgrade c/storage and a lot of other dependencies.
Took over from depenabot due to some deprecations.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7852 (0283b56) into main (183f28b) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7852   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.85%   49.86%           
=======================================
  Files         153      153           
  Lines       16597    16597           
=======================================
+ Hits         8275     8276    +1     
+ Misses       7302     7301    -1     
  Partials     1020     1020           

[littlejawa]

I think I found the problem.
The "prestart" hook that we use has been deprecated. The hooks marked for "prestart" are now executed at CreateRuntime (see vendor/github.com/containers/common/pkg/hooks/hooks.go change in your PR).

I've looked on the kata side, and found that the CreateRuntime hooks are run at sandbox creation, but not at container creation. Adding the call there fixes the issue.
I raised an issue on the kata side, and will push a fix ASAP.

Now for this PR: as our CI is testing only with released versions of kata, and the fix will probably take time to get released, I suggest that you skip this test for now. I will re-enable it when the fix is in the version we use for testing in the CI.
Can you look at the contrib/test/ci/vars.list and add hooks.bats to the list of skip files (as there is only one test in it) ? Adding it as part of this PR would make sure we keep track of when/why it's been disabled.

[kannon92]

Great, @littlejawa I'll skip the test but I'll create an issue for anyone to follow up on it when kata is released.

[kannon92]

/test ci-fedora-integration

[kannon92]

/retest

[sohankunkerkar]

/lgtm

[kannon92]

/hold

I think @haircommander has mentioned that this needs to go in once 1.30 is wrapped up. Please feel free to unhold once that is the case.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kannon92, saschagrunert, sohankunkerkar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [saschagrunert,sohankunkerkar]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[saschagrunert]

@haircommander can we unhold this?

[haircommander]

not yet, we need to cut 1.30.0 first

[openshift-merge-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[sohankunkerkar]

Now that we have v1.30, we can proceed with this PR. Since Kevin is on PTO, I can help push it to the finish line.

[sohankunkerkar]

@cri-o/cri-o-maintainers thoughts?

[saschagrunert]

Now that we have v1.30, we can proceed with this PR. Since Kevin is on PTO, I can help push it to the finish line.

Yep, let's get the dependencies up-to-date again! 🙌

[sohankunkerkar]

Closing this in favor of #8133