Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert and retract typ check #150

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023
Merged

Revert and retract typ check #150

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023

Conversation

cristaloleg
Copy link
Member

After additional chats and rethinking this should be reverted. Thanks everyone for the input.

Updates #147
Fixes #149

CC: @juliangp @frankdvd

Copy link
Contributor

@FZambia FZambia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's a right decision, I originally was somehow sure it's required by spec and this was a miss from the library. But the spec is clear - it's optional.

And making such check in v5 will cause many inconveniences for users. I think it may be addressed in some other ways in the future for cases when typ value is always known to be set.

Copy link

@juliangp juliangp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Thanks

@cristaloleg cristaloleg merged commit a087c84 into main Nov 8, 2023
3 checks passed
@cristaloleg cristaloleg deleted the revert-typ-check branch November 8, 2023 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document Parse & ErrNotJWTType relation in GUIDE.md
4 participants