Add a page documenting Crossplane terminology #2443
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
muvaf
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2021
We don't currently have a single place to find details about common Crossplane concepts. I've added this under 'concepts' rather than 'reference' in the hope it might be more discoverable there, though I could go either way. Signed-off-by: Nic Cope <negz@rk0n.org>
|
Successfully created backport PR #2446 for |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
We don't currently have a single place to find details about common Crossplane concepts. I've added this under 'concepts' rather than 'reference' in the hope it might be more discoverable there, though I could go either way.
I have:
make reviewableto ensure this PR is ready for review.backport release-x.ylabels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.How has this code been tested
I've asked a few Upbounders to review this, and would like to have the community take a look before merging.