Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't auto-assign reviewers, for now #4853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

negz
Copy link
Member

@negz negz commented Oct 19, 2023

Description of your changes

This PR updates CODEOWNERS to avoid auto-assigning reviewers, for now. Instead it assigns only maintainers.

We don't think this will be the end state, but we're taking a first step to simplify to avoid the following issues:

  • We have too many reviewers right now. We end up with bystander syndrome, and it's unclear who should review.
  • When Crossplane-reviewers is assigned, CODEOWNERS requires one of them to approve, even if a maintainer approves.

I have:

Need help with this checklist? See the cheat sheet.

Signed-off-by: Nic Cope <nicc@rk0n.org>
@negz negz requested review from a team as code owners October 19, 2023 19:01
Copy link
Contributor

@bobh66 bobh66 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@negz negz merged commit 48f9ed5 into crossplane:master Oct 19, 2023
16 of 17 checks passed
@negz negz deleted the ownersheep branch October 19, 2023 19:52
# for final review.
# The goal of this file is for most PRs to automatically and fairly have 1 to 2
# maintainers set as PR reviewers. All maintainers have permission to approve
# and merge PRs. PRs only need
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like this sentence didn't get finished? 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants